$100,000+
$150 - $199 / hr
10 - 49
SMBs
United States, Frederick
2000
Within 2-3 weeks
Custom Software To Reach Your Vision

A team of technology craftsmen and craftswomen, who create custom software solutions that transform your process, empower your people, and help you reach your vision. The team of experts embrace innovation, but are grounded in the depth of their experience having worked with more than 750 clients to streamline operations, connect users, and deliver ROI. They partner in a radically open and transparent process to understand your unique needs, then build a powerful software solution. Orases commit to the long-term, partnering with you to give you a flexible, scalable solution that can grow and adapt with you.

Custom Software To Reach Your Vision

Techreviewer Score

  Submit a review
5.0

Client review platforms

The company's reputation is reflected through ratings and reviews from different review websites:

5.0
(74 reviews)Clutch
4.3
(1 reviews)DesignRush
5.0
(5 reviews)GoodFirms
4.9
(43 reviews)Google

Employee review platforms

The company's work culture and employee satisfaction from top workplace review platforms:

4.7
(52 reviews)Glassdoor

AI Overview

Powered bytechreviewer AI
This company performance overview is based on AI analysis of 85 client reviews across 3 different review platforms. Read more about our methodology.
Last updated: September 2026

Performance snapshot

Orases is a well-established custom software and web development firm with a broad client portfolio spanning healthcare, education, nonprofits, manufacturing, and financial services. Across 85 reviews spanning nearly two decades, the vendor consistently earns strong marks in technical expertise, project management, communication, and client outcomes. The overwhelming majority of ratings are perfect or near-perfect, with only isolated sub-4.0 sub-metric scores in cost and schedule. No recurring structural weaknesses emerge, though a handful of older reviews note minor budget concerns.

Performance breakdown

Technical expertise
Strong

Reviewers consistently cite high-quality code, modern technology adoption including AI, AWS, React, PHP, Python, Microsoft Azure, and Magento, and successful integrations with Oracle, HubSpot, QuickBooks, and Salesforce. Multiple anchor reviews reference specific technologies, timelines, and quantified outcomes confirming high technical density.

Project management & delivery
Strong

Clients across multiple industries report consistent on-time or ahead-of-schedule delivery, with agile sprint cycles, weekly check-ins, and tools such as Jira, Trello, Confluence, and Basecamp cited regularly. A full platform was delivered live in eight months following a six-month demo, illustrating reliable milestone adherence.

Communication & collaboration
Strong

Clients across all platforms highlight responsiveness, transparency, and multi-channel availability via Slack, Zoom, Google Meet, email, and phone. One GoodFirms reviewer noted occasional minor communication gaps, but these were resolved promptly and represent an isolated concern across an otherwise consistent record.

Reliability
Strong

Long-term engagements spanning multiple years and repeat client relationships indicate strong product stability and consistent responsiveness. One review noted some bugs during development, though the team's QA process was credited with resolving them before delivery. No pattern of post-launch failures or unresolved issues appears.

Client satisfaction & outcomes
Strong

Tangible outcomes are cited across multiple reviews: a site health score rising from 59% to 85%, 103,000 resources posted on a sports platform, admin costs reduced by 50% in the first implementation year, and 10 major sales in 2 years versus 1 in the prior 3 years. Willingness-to-refer scores are near-universally at 5.0.

Best for

Orases is best suited for mid-market organizations and SMBs requiring complex, custom software platforms, legacy system modernization, or AI-integrated solutions. Particularly strong for nonprofits, regulated industries, and long-term managed development engagements.

Clients info

Orases serves a diverse client base spanning nonprofits, healthcare, education, manufacturing, financial services, legal, media, and advertising. Client sizes range from solo founders and micro-businesses to enterprises with over 5,000 employees, though SMBs and mid-market organizations dominate the review pool. Project budgets range broadly from under $10,000 to $1,000,000–$9,999,999, with the most common range falling between $50,000 and $999,999. Primary industries represented include Nonprofit & Associations, Healthcare & Medical, Education, Manufacturing, Financial Services, Advertising & Marketing, Media & Entertainment, Legal, Telecommunications. Typical client size bands include 1–10 Employees, 11–50 Employees, 51–200 Employees, 201–500 Employees, 1,001–5,000 Employees. Common project budget ranges include $10,000 to $49,999, $50,000 to $199,999, $200,000 to $999,999, $1,000,000 to $9,999,999.

Review strength

The assessment is based on 85 reviews drawn from 3 platforms, with the most recent review dated May 2026 and the oldest from 2017. The majority of reviews fall within the last five years, providing strong recency coverage. Reviews older than three years are present but represent a minority and are consistent in tone with more recent feedback. Review date range: November 2017 - May 2026.

Performance breakdown

Technical expertise
Strong

Reviewers consistently cite high-quality code, modern technology adoption including AI, AWS, React, PHP, Python, Microsoft Azure, and Magento, and successful integrations with Oracle, HubSpot, QuickBooks, and Salesforce. Multiple anchor reviews reference specific technologies, timelines, and quantified outcomes confirming high technical density.

Project management & delivery
Strong

Clients across multiple industries report consistent on-time or ahead-of-schedule delivery, with agile sprint cycles, weekly check-ins, and tools such as Jira, Trello, Confluence, and Basecamp cited regularly. A full platform was delivered live in eight months following a six-month demo, illustrating reliable milestone adherence.

Communication & collaboration
Strong

Clients across all platforms highlight responsiveness, transparency, and multi-channel availability via Slack, Zoom, Google Meet, email, and phone. One GoodFirms reviewer noted occasional minor communication gaps, but these were resolved promptly and represent an isolated concern across an otherwise consistent record.

Reliability
Strong

Long-term engagements spanning multiple years and repeat client relationships indicate strong product stability and consistent responsiveness. One review noted some bugs during development, though the team's QA process was credited with resolving them before delivery. No pattern of post-launch failures or unresolved issues appears.

Client satisfaction & outcomes
Strong

Tangible outcomes are cited across multiple reviews: a site health score rising from 59% to 85%, 103,000 resources posted on a sports platform, admin costs reduced by 50% in the first implementation year, and 10 major sales in 2 years versus 1 in the prior 3 years. Willingness-to-refer scores are near-universally at 5.0.

Location and contacts

United States, Frederick
5728 INDUSTRY LN
21704
United States, Washington
700 12th Street, NW Suite 700
20005

Major clients

American Kidney Fund
NFL
Service Coordination Inc.
NATSO
IEC
John Hopkins University
Invisible Fence
DFA
American Foods Group
Melwood
USA Football
US Lacrosse
Next Day Dumpsters