SoftTeco is a software development company founded in 2008 that provides custom software development services. Currently, we deliver professional services to customers located in the USA, Europe and Canada. The core strength of SoftTeco comes from our highly professional team of software engineers. SoftTeco has successfully completed over 650 projects in various industrial domains using different technology platforms always adhering to best quality and transparency standards. SoftTeco leverages its first-hand IT expertise and experience from working within numerous industries to bring real business value to every project.
SoftTeco is a software development company founded in 2008 that provides custom software development services. Currently, we deliver professional services to customers located in the USA, Europe and Canada. The core strength of SoftTeco comes from our highly professional team of software engineers. SoftTeco has successfully completed over 650 projects in various industrial domains using different technology platforms always adhering to best quality and transparency standards. SoftTeco leverages its first-hand IT expertise and experience from working within numerous industries to bring real business value to every project.
AI Overview
Performance snapshot
SoftTeco is a software development and staff augmentation vendor with a long-established track record across mobile, web, and custom software projects. The review corpus skews heavily positive, with most ratings clustering between 4.0 and 5.0, but the majority of evidence dates from 2015–2020, limiting recency confidence. Recurring strengths include flexibility, cost-effectiveness, and developer integration into client teams. Minor concerns surface around timeline estimation accuracy and occasional back-end capability gaps.
Performance breakdown
Technical expertise
StrongMultiple reviews confirm proficiency across C#, .NET, React Native, Python, JavaScript, Angular, Java, and Spring. One reviewer noted a prestigious best-software award and 150,000 beta downloads, while another flagged relative weakness in back-end development versus front-end work.
Project management & delivery
MixedSeveral clients praised proactive project management and one app was delivered a full month ahead of schedule. However, at least one reviewer noted a recurring tendency to underestimate timelines, pulling the schedule sub-rating to 3.0 in that engagement.
Communication & collaboration
MixedClients consistently describe developers as integrating well into internal teams and communicating openly. One reviewer noted that non-native English speakers occasionally caused misunderstandings, representing a specific and recurring collaboration risk worth monitoring.
Reliability
StrongMultiple clients describe SoftTeco developers as responsible, accountable, and willing to work beyond standard hours to meet deliverables. A 7–8 year ongoing relationship cited by one partner further reinforces consistent delivery standards over time.
Client satisfaction & outcomes
StrongTangible outcomes include a top-10 App Store ranking for a children's education app, 150,000 beta downloads with a best-software award, and documented revenue increases in the Israeli market. Cost sub-ratings dip to 3.5 in two engagements, indicating occasional value perception gaps.
Best for
SoftTeco is best suited for startups and mid-sized firms seeking cost-effective staff augmentation or custom mobile and web application development, particularly where long-term partnership and developer embeddedness within client teams are priorities.
Clients info
SoftTeco's client base spans business services, information technology, media, advertising, and consumer app sectors. Engagements range from 1–10 employee startups to enterprises with over 1,000 staff, with the most common band being small to mid-sized firms. Project budgets predominantly fall between $50,000 and $199,999, with several engagements in the $200,000–$999,999 range. Primary industries represented include Information Technology, Business Services, Media & Publishing, Advertising & Marketing, Mobile & Consumer Apps. Typical client size bands include 1–10 Employees, 11–50 Employees, 51–200 Employees. Common project budget ranges include $10,000 to $49,999, $50,000 to $199,999, $200,000 to $999,999.
Review strength
The assessment is based on 15 reviews across 3 platforms. The most recent substantive reviews date from 2020, with the majority concentrated between 2015 and 2017. A single 2025 review offers no actionable detail, and all reviews older than one year should be interpreted with caution given potential changes in team composition and service quality. Review date range: Jun 10, 2015 - 1 December, 2025.
Performance breakdown
Technical expertise
StrongMultiple reviews confirm proficiency across C#, .NET, React Native, Python, JavaScript, Angular, Java, and Spring. One reviewer noted a prestigious best-software award and 150,000 beta downloads, while another flagged relative weakness in back-end development versus front-end work.
Project management & delivery
MixedSeveral clients praised proactive project management and one app was delivered a full month ahead of schedule. However, at least one reviewer noted a recurring tendency to underestimate timelines, pulling the schedule sub-rating to 3.0 in that engagement.
Communication & collaboration
MixedClients consistently describe developers as integrating well into internal teams and communicating openly. One reviewer noted that non-native English speakers occasionally caused misunderstandings, representing a specific and recurring collaboration risk worth monitoring.
Reliability
StrongMultiple clients describe SoftTeco developers as responsible, accountable, and willing to work beyond standard hours to meet deliverables. A 7–8 year ongoing relationship cited by one partner further reinforces consistent delivery standards over time.
Client satisfaction & outcomes
StrongTangible outcomes include a top-10 App Store ranking for a children's education app, 150,000 beta downloads with a best-software award, and documented revenue increases in the Israeli market. Cost sub-ratings dip to 3.5 in two engagements, indicating occasional value perception gaps.