unicrew engineers competitive advantages to help small and medium businesses to become big ones, to turn startups into grownups. The company is a web and software development house, which provides product development and team extension services with a sustainable commitment to the quality of the delivered solutions. unicrew’s expertise consists of 7 years of engineering experience; more than 120 successfully delivered projects; engineering for about 13 main business domains; Microsoft, PHP, JavaScript technical focus. Most of our clients’ products have become profitable and successful businesses, 2 of them were successfully sold at the early startup development stage, in particular, due to our contribution to their technical innovations. unicrew’s credibility and attitude are proven by 51 reviews given by our clients from the UK, US, EU on Clutch and other independent industry resources, 38 Google reviews given by partners and team members (as of 11/30/19). Claiming the company as a great place to work with and to work at. Since 2017 company has been 4 times featured among Clutch Global Leaders and shortlisted among the most trusted service providers in different tech areas on the industry reviewing platforms like TechReviewer, YourTeam, others. Besides meeting Artelogic at the technical events, WebSummit, Collision, RISE, they participate in each year.
unicrew engineers competitive advantages to help small and medium businesses to become big ones, to turn startups into grownups. The company is a web and software development house, which provides product development and team extension services with a sustainable commitment to the quality of the delivered solutions. unicrew’s expertise consists of 7 years of engineering experience; more than 120 successfully delivered projects; engineering for about 13 main business domains; Microsoft, PHP, JavaScript technical focus. Most of our clients’ products have become profitable and successful businesses, 2 of them were successfully sold at the early startup development stage, in particular, due to our contribution to their technical innovations. unicrew’s credibility and attitude are proven by 51 reviews given by our clients from the UK, US, EU on Clutch and other independent industry resources, 38 Google reviews given by partners and team members (as of 11/30/19). Claiming the company as a great place to work with and to work at. Since 2017 company has been 4 times featured among Clutch Global Leaders and shortlisted among the most trusted service providers in different tech areas on the industry reviewing platforms like TechReviewer, YourTeam, others. Besides meeting Artelogic at the technical events, WebSummit, Collision, RISE, they participate in each year.
AI Overview
Performance snapshot
unicrew (formerly Artelogic) is a well-established software development and staff augmentation firm with a long, consistent track record spanning over a decade. The review corpus is dominated by perfect or near-perfect scores across all sub-metrics, producing Strong ratings in every evaluated category. No recurring negative trends, declining scores, or systemic concerns were identified across the 58 reviews analyzed. The vendor demonstrates particular depth in custom software development, IT staff augmentation, and web development across a wide variety of industries.
Performance breakdown
Technical expertise
StrongReviewers consistently highlight proficiency across a broad, modern technology stack including .NET, C#, PHP/Laravel, React, Angular, TypeScript, AWS, Azure, Java, Vue.js, and SQL. Multiple anchor reviews cite named technologies alongside quantified outcomes, confirming high-density technical credibility.
Project management & delivery
StrongAcross dozens of engagements, reviewers repeatedly confirm on-time and on-budget delivery, with tools such as Jira, GitHub, and Agile/Scrum methodologies cited. One reviewer noted 6 of 7 major projects delivered on time and on budget, and another confirmed tight deadlines were consistently met.
Communication & collaboration
StrongCommunication is the most frequently praised attribute across all reviews, with clients citing responsiveness via MS Teams, Slack, WhatsApp, Google Meet, and email. Reviewers describe the team as transparent, proactive, and seamlessly integrated into client workflows including Scrum teams.
Reliability
StrongThe vendor demonstrates strong reliability across long-term and short-term engagements alike, with stable codebases, minimal maintenance issues, and near-perfect quality sub-ratings. One client noted that maintenance requests are still answered within 24 hours years after project completion.
Client satisfaction & outcomes
StrongMultiple reviews document tangible business outcomes: a 30% reduction in AWS costs, 40% increase in employee engagement, 15–20% revenue growth, doubled data processing capacity, and platform growth from hundreds to thousands of companies. Cost sub-ratings are occasionally 4.0 but never below, with no material dissatisfaction noted.
Best for
unicrew is best suited for SMBs and mid-market technology companies seeking reliable staff augmentation, custom software development, or long-term development partnerships. The vendor excels in .NET, PHP, React, and cloud-adjacent stacks with consistent on-time, on-budget delivery.
Clients info
unicrew serves a broad client base spanning software and IT services, SaaS, financial services, advertising and marketing, logistics, education, retail, and hospitality. The majority of clients are small-to-mid-size businesses with 1–200 employees, with several engagements involving firms of 51–500 employees. Project budgets most commonly range from $10,000 to $999,999, with a small number of engagements exceeding $1,000,000 for long-term partnerships. Primary industries represented include Software & IT Services, SaaS, Financial Services, Advertising & Marketing, Logistics & Transportation, Education, Retail & E-commerce, Hospitality & Leisure. Typical client size bands include 1–10 Employees, 11–50 Employees, 51–200 Employees, 201–500 Employees. Common project budget ranges include $10,000 to $49,999, $50,000 to $199,999, $200,000 to $999,999, $1,000,000 to $9,999,999.
Review strength
The assessment is based on 58 reviews drawn from a single platform, spanning from March 2015 to November 2025. The review base is substantial and recent, with the majority of reviews published from 2022 onward. However, a portion of reviews are more than three years old, which should be considered when evaluating consistency over time. Review date range: Mar 2015 - Nov 2025.
Performance breakdown
Technical expertise
StrongReviewers consistently highlight proficiency across a broad, modern technology stack including .NET, C#, PHP/Laravel, React, Angular, TypeScript, AWS, Azure, Java, Vue.js, and SQL. Multiple anchor reviews cite named technologies alongside quantified outcomes, confirming high-density technical credibility.
Project management & delivery
StrongAcross dozens of engagements, reviewers repeatedly confirm on-time and on-budget delivery, with tools such as Jira, GitHub, and Agile/Scrum methodologies cited. One reviewer noted 6 of 7 major projects delivered on time and on budget, and another confirmed tight deadlines were consistently met.
Communication & collaboration
StrongCommunication is the most frequently praised attribute across all reviews, with clients citing responsiveness via MS Teams, Slack, WhatsApp, Google Meet, and email. Reviewers describe the team as transparent, proactive, and seamlessly integrated into client workflows including Scrum teams.
Reliability
StrongThe vendor demonstrates strong reliability across long-term and short-term engagements alike, with stable codebases, minimal maintenance issues, and near-perfect quality sub-ratings. One client noted that maintenance requests are still answered within 24 hours years after project completion.
Client satisfaction & outcomes
StrongMultiple reviews document tangible business outcomes: a 30% reduction in AWS costs, 40% increase in employee engagement, 15–20% revenue growth, doubled data processing capacity, and platform growth from hundreds to thousands of companies. Cost sub-ratings are occasionally 4.0 but never below, with no material dissatisfaction noted.