$50,000+
$30 - $49 / hr
50 - 99
Enterprise
United States, Houston
2014
Other
best mobile application developers

Founded in the year 2014, Auxesis Infotech is counted amongst the top mobile app development firm to create an exceptional mobile application. Over the years, we have worked on many different mobile app development projects. As a leading mobile app development agency, we have a proven track record of delivering exceptional services and great results to clients. Talking about our prowess, well, we offer all types of mobile app development services. Be it cross-platform app development, native app development, hybrid app development, iOS app development, Windows app development, or android app development services, we are the best bet for all your mobile app related needs.

best mobile application developers

Techreviewer rating

  Submit a review
4.8

Client review platforms

The company's reputation is reflected through ratings and reviews from different review websites:

4.9
(30 reviews)Clutch
4.7
(7 reviews)DesignRush
4.6
(21 reviews)Trustpilot
4.6
(12 reviews)GoodFirms
3.8
(9 reviews)Google

Employee review platforms

The company's work culture and employee satisfaction from top workplace review platforms:

4.2
(59 reviews)Glassdoor

AI Overview

Powered bytechreviewer AI
This company performance overview is based on AI analysis of 62 client reviews across 4 different review platforms. Read more about our methodology.
Last updated: April 2026

Performance snapshot

Auxesis Infotech is a web development and design firm with demonstrated strength in CMS-based solutions, particularly Drupal and WordPress, serving small-to-mid-sized clients across diverse industries. The majority of reviews are positive, yielding Strong or Mixed ratings across most categories, though two independently corroborated negative reviews — describing a single project that ran nearly 5x over schedule with incomplete delivery and poor communication — introduce meaningful reliability concerns. The review base is large in volume but skewed toward older content and shows notable duplication across platforms, which moderates overall confidence. Communication and project management are consistent strengths, while reliability remains the primary area of caution.

Performance breakdown

Technical expertise
Strong

Multiple reviews cite hands-on proficiency in Drupal, WordPress, Laravel, Angular, HTML5, and CSS, with delivered outputs including LMS platforms, blockchain frontends, and e-commerce sites. A blockchain property platform garnered over 5,000 user registrations within one week of launch, anchoring technical credibility with a quantified outcome.

Project management & delivery
Mixed

Most clients report on-time delivery, organized task tracking via Trello, and proactive milestone planning. However, one well-documented negative case describes a project extending to nearly 5x its planned duration with no functional delivery, introducing a meaningful exception to an otherwise consistent delivery record.

Communication & collaboration
Strong

Transparent, frequent communication is cited across the majority of reviews, with daily updates, Skype calls, email follow-ups, and Trello task tracking commonly referenced. One negative review flags a communication breakdown mid-project, but this appears to be an isolated case against a broadly consistent pattern of responsiveness.

Reliability
Mixed

While most engagements conclude with stable, functioning deliverables and satisfied clients, two reviews from the same problematic project — appearing independently across multiple platforms — describe an incomplete, non-functional product after ten months. This recurring negative signal is sufficient to warrant a Mixed rating despite the broader positive trend.

Client satisfaction & outcomes
Mixed

Positive business outcomes are noted across several engagements, including improved Google rankings, increased web traffic, and a seamlessly launched booking platform. However, the absence of quantified ROI metrics in most reviews, combined with the documented failed engagement, prevents a Strong rating despite widespread satisfaction.

Best for

Auxesis Infotech is best suited for small to mid-sized businesses seeking CMS-driven web portals, e-commerce platforms, or LMS solutions on Drupal, WordPress, or Laravel, particularly those with budgets under $50,000 seeking cost-effective, communicative development partners.

Clients info

Auxesis Infotech primarily serves small businesses and startups across e-commerce, education, real estate, hospitality, and media sectors. Most clients fall in the 1–50 employee range, with project budgets predominantly under $10,000, though a small number of engagements reach the $10,000–$50,000 range and one project exceeded $50,000. Primary industries represented include E-Commerce & Retail, Education & E-Learning, Real Estate, Hospitality & Leisure, Media & Publishing, Healthcare. Typical client size bands include 1–10 Employees, 11–50 Employees, 51–200 Employees. Common project budget ranges include Less than $10,000, $10,000 to $49,999, $50,000 to $199,999.

Review strength

62 reviews were analyzed across 4 platforms. A significant portion of reviews appear duplicated across platforms by the same reviewers, which reduces the effective independent sample size. The most recent reviews date to late 2022, meaning the majority of content is between two and six years old, and no reviews from 2023 or 2024 are present, limiting visibility into current performance. Review date range: 2018-02-12 - 2022-11-16.

Performance breakdown

Technical expertise
Strong

Multiple reviews cite hands-on proficiency in Drupal, WordPress, Laravel, Angular, HTML5, and CSS, with delivered outputs including LMS platforms, blockchain frontends, and e-commerce sites. A blockchain property platform garnered over 5,000 user registrations within one week of launch, anchoring technical credibility with a quantified outcome.

Project management & delivery
Mixed

Most clients report on-time delivery, organized task tracking via Trello, and proactive milestone planning. However, one well-documented negative case describes a project extending to nearly 5x its planned duration with no functional delivery, introducing a meaningful exception to an otherwise consistent delivery record.

Communication & collaboration
Strong

Transparent, frequent communication is cited across the majority of reviews, with daily updates, Skype calls, email follow-ups, and Trello task tracking commonly referenced. One negative review flags a communication breakdown mid-project, but this appears to be an isolated case against a broadly consistent pattern of responsiveness.

Reliability
Mixed

While most engagements conclude with stable, functioning deliverables and satisfied clients, two reviews from the same problematic project — appearing independently across multiple platforms — describe an incomplete, non-functional product after ten months. This recurring negative signal is sufficient to warrant a Mixed rating despite the broader positive trend.

Client satisfaction & outcomes
Mixed

Positive business outcomes are noted across several engagements, including improved Google rankings, increased web traffic, and a seamlessly launched booking platform. However, the absence of quantified ROI metrics in most reviews, combined with the documented failed engagement, prevents a Strong rating despite widespread satisfaction.

Location and contacts

United States, Houston
10685-B Hazelhurst Dr. # 25097, Houston, Texas 77043, United States
77043
+991 1870050

Major clients

ray.james
ray james