Iqra Technology is IT Solutions and Services Company. We are salesforce and Microsoft partner company. We aim to provide cost-effective IT services within the customer’s budget range. We scrutinize, design, and develop solutions custom-made for the business necessities. We deliver services in various domains including CRM, ERP, e-commerce, CMS, business intelligence, web development, customized applications, portals, mobile apps, & RPA technologies. We provide IT services starting from $2100 per month and 2 weeks free trial. Services/Technologies we provide: Salesforce CRM Services Microsoft Dynamics CRM SharePoint FinancialForce Services Custom Application Development Services Qlik Sense Services Power BI RPA – Ui Path Website Design & Development Magento E-Commerce Services IT Outsourcing
Iqra Technology is IT Solutions and Services Company. We are salesforce and Microsoft partner company. We aim to provide cost-effective IT services within the customer’s budget range. We scrutinize, design, and develop solutions custom-made for the business necessities. We deliver services in various domains including CRM, ERP, e-commerce, CMS, business intelligence, web development, customized applications, portals, mobile apps, & RPA technologies. We provide IT services starting from $2100 per month and 2 weeks free trial. Services/Technologies we provide: Salesforce CRM Services Microsoft Dynamics CRM SharePoint FinancialForce Services Custom Application Development Services Qlik Sense Services Power BI RPA – Ui Path Website Design & Development Magento E-Commerce Services IT Outsourcing
AI Overview
Performance snapshot
Iqra Technology is a small IT services and software development firm whose review profile is dominated by employee and intern testimonials rather than client project feedback. Only one review originates from a verified external client engagement, limiting the reliability of any performance assessment. The single client-facing review is positive and highlights technical expertise, but the absence of detailed project outcomes across multiple client voices prevents confident scoring in most categories.
Performance breakdown
Technical expertise
Not enough dataOnly one external client review explicitly references technical expertise, noting knowledgeable resources across mobile app and software development. No specific technologies, metrics, or project complexity details are provided to substantiate a stronger rating.
Project management & delivery
Not enough dataNo client reviews reference timelines, milestone adherence, or delivery processes in sufficient detail. The single verified client review does not address project management practices, leaving this category unassessable.
Communication & collaboration
Not enough dataOne general client-facing review references a cooperative working relationship, and internal reviewers note supportive team management. However, no external client data addresses communication cadence, availability, or transparency in meaningful depth.
Reliability
Not enough dataOne client review describes satisfaction with three dedicated resources and expresses intent to re-engage, suggesting consistent delivery. However, a single data point with no sub-metric detail on quality or bug rates is insufficient for a reliable rating.
Client satisfaction & outcomes
MixedThe sole verified client review is positive, with a 4.0 quality sub-rating and stated intent to rehire. However, no quantified business outcomes or ROI metrics are present, and the quality sub-rating falling below 4.5 introduces a mild qualification.
Best for
Iqra Technology appears best suited for small businesses or startups seeking cost-effective mobile app and software development resources, particularly for staff augmentation or dedicated resource arrangements in the $10K–$50K budget range.
Clients info
Client industry data is extremely limited. The only identifiable external client is an EdTech firm (EdIT Solutions), represented by its Founder, suggesting engagement with small businesses or startups. Project budgets appear to fall in the $10,001–$50,000 range based on the single available data point. Primary industries represented include EdTech. Typical client size bands include Small businesses / Startups. Common project budget ranges include $10,001 – $50,000.
Review strength
Nine reviews were analyzed across three platforms. Critically, the vast majority are employee or intern testimonials with no client project context. Only one review originates from a verified external client. Several reviews are recent (late 2025 to early 2026), but one client-relevant review dates to approximately 4 weeks prior to analysis and one to November 2023. Review date range: 2023-11-23 - 2026-02-05.
Performance breakdown
Technical expertise
Not enough dataOnly one external client review explicitly references technical expertise, noting knowledgeable resources across mobile app and software development. No specific technologies, metrics, or project complexity details are provided to substantiate a stronger rating.
Project management & delivery
Not enough dataNo client reviews reference timelines, milestone adherence, or delivery processes in sufficient detail. The single verified client review does not address project management practices, leaving this category unassessable.
Communication & collaboration
Not enough dataOne general client-facing review references a cooperative working relationship, and internal reviewers note supportive team management. However, no external client data addresses communication cadence, availability, or transparency in meaningful depth.
Reliability
Not enough dataOne client review describes satisfaction with three dedicated resources and expresses intent to re-engage, suggesting consistent delivery. However, a single data point with no sub-metric detail on quality or bug rates is insufficient for a reliable rating.
Client satisfaction & outcomes
MixedThe sole verified client review is positive, with a 4.0 quality sub-rating and stated intent to rehire. However, no quantified business outcomes or ROI metrics are present, and the quality sub-rating falling below 4.5 introduces a mild qualification.