$5,000+
$30 - $49 / hr
100 - 249
SMBs
India, Noida
2009
Within 1 week
We Mean It Innovation

It is recognized by the IT stakeholders, as a premier mobile app development service provider, that can build the perfect mobile application for any business. With a culmination of cutting-edge technology and advanced development practices, the Company has developed and deployed hundreds of applications across business verticals and has consistently maintained a high success rate for 12 years and counting. Maxtra Technologies is recently recognized as a partner for businesses around the world on June 24, 2020. The Company’s ability to render customized software solutions is highly rated. In addition, it was acknowledged and honored with a certificate of appreciation by Business Connect as the company in focus. That the Company has been successfully serving its clients for 10 years now. It is recognized as the global face for digital marketing, website design & development, mobile application development, and direct selling software solutions. The company offers more than a helping hand to businesses looking forward for a future full of evolution, development, and unparalleled quality services. We also pride ourselves on our after-sales client care including our guarantees, staff training, and technical support.

We Mean It Innovation

Techreviewer rating

  Submit a review
4.8

Client review platforms

The company's reputation is reflected through ratings and reviews from different review websites:

3.3
(12 reviews)Clutch
2.6
(4 reviews)Trustpilot
5.0
(2 reviews)GoodFirms
4.1
(71 reviews)Google

Employee review platforms

The company's work culture and employee satisfaction from top workplace review platforms:

3.9
(62 reviews)Glassdoor

AI Overview

Powered bytechreviewer AI
This company performance overview is based on AI analysis of 23 client reviews across 4 different review platforms. Read more about our methodology.
Last updated: April 2026

Performance snapshot

Maxtra Technologies presents a deeply polarized performance profile, with a cluster of strong early-era reviews (2019–2022) contrasted sharply by a persistent pattern of serious complaints from 2023 onward. Multiple clients across independent platforms report non-delivery of paid projects, unresponsiveness after payment, and alleged fraudulent practices including withholding source code. The positive reviews are largely older or lack the density needed to offset the volume and severity of recent negative accounts.

Performance breakdown

Technical expertise
Mixed

Earlier reviews from 2020–2022 highlight solid mobile app and e-commerce development capabilities, with mentions of UX proficiency and technology understanding. However, multiple recent reviews (2023–2025) describe delivered software as non-functional, riddled with errors, and missing core features such as payment integration.

Project management & delivery
Weak

A recurring pattern of non-delivery is documented across at least five reviews from 2023 to 2025, with clients reporting stalled projects, missed milestones, and complete abandonment after payments were collected. On-time delivery noted in earlier engagements does not offset this trend.

Communication & collaboration
Weak

Multiple clients across platforms explicitly report that the team stopped responding after payment was received. Behavior described includes missed meetings, pressure to sign off on incomplete deliverables, and refusal to engage constructively with client feedback or dispute resolution.

Reliability
Weak

The reliability record is severely undermined by multiple accounts of non-functional deliverables, source code withheld unless additional fees were paid, and project abandonment. These issues span multiple geographies and project types, indicating a systemic rather than isolated concern.

Client satisfaction & outcomes
Weak

While a handful of older clients reported positive outcomes such as increased bookings, app store downloads, and operational efficiency, the majority of reviews from 2023 onward document financial loss, undelivered products, and formal payment disputes. The negative outcomes are both recent and numerous.

Best for

Based on available evidence, Maxtra Technologies cannot be confidently recommended for any client segment at this time, given the volume and recency of non-delivery and payment-related complaints across multiple platforms.

Clients info

Clients span a range of industries including home services, hospitality, transportation, e-commerce, and information technology, predominantly small businesses and micro-enterprises. Most documented project budgets fall under $10,000, with a few engagements reaching $10,000–$50,000 and one outlier at $50,000–$199,999. Primary industries represented include E-Commerce & Consumer Goods, Hospitality & Leisure, Transportation, Information Technology, Home Services. Typical client size bands include 1–10 Employees, 11–50 Employees, 51–200 Employees. Common project budget ranges include Less than $10,000, $10,000 to $49,999.

Review strength

The assessment is based on 23 reviews spanning four platforms, covering a date range from mid-2019 to early 2026. A significant portion of the positive reviews are more than three years old, while the majority of negative reviews are recent (2023–2025), making the recency-weighted signal predominantly unfavorable. Review date range: Jun 2019 - Mar 2026.

Performance breakdown

Technical expertise
Mixed

Earlier reviews from 2020–2022 highlight solid mobile app and e-commerce development capabilities, with mentions of UX proficiency and technology understanding. However, multiple recent reviews (2023–2025) describe delivered software as non-functional, riddled with errors, and missing core features such as payment integration.

Project management & delivery
Weak

A recurring pattern of non-delivery is documented across at least five reviews from 2023 to 2025, with clients reporting stalled projects, missed milestones, and complete abandonment after payments were collected. On-time delivery noted in earlier engagements does not offset this trend.

Communication & collaboration
Weak

Multiple clients across platforms explicitly report that the team stopped responding after payment was received. Behavior described includes missed meetings, pressure to sign off on incomplete deliverables, and refusal to engage constructively with client feedback or dispute resolution.

Reliability
Weak

The reliability record is severely undermined by multiple accounts of non-functional deliverables, source code withheld unless additional fees were paid, and project abandonment. These issues span multiple geographies and project types, indicating a systemic rather than isolated concern.

Client satisfaction & outcomes
Weak

While a handful of older clients reported positive outcomes such as increased bookings, app store downloads, and operational efficiency, the majority of reviews from 2023 onward document financial loss, undelivered products, and formal payment disputes. The negative outcomes are both recent and numerous.

Location and contacts

India, Noida
Aristos Tower, B-71, 2nd Floor, Sec.-67
201301
+91 8744 022 220
United States, New York
#2895 99 Wall Street
10005
+1 (917) 795-8807
South Africa, Cape Town
1st Floor, Block B, North Park, Black River Park
7925

Major clients

Fixer
Rent a Temp
RingMoney
iWork