$5,000+
$30 - $49 / hr
100 - 249
SMBs
Poland, Warsaw
2013
Within 2-3 weeks
Reliable QA teams for long-term software quality

QA Madness is a full-cycle quality engineering provider for complex and regulated digital products. We help software companies assess existing QA processes, build quality systems from the ground up, execute testing, implement automation, maintain product quality, and transfer knowledge to internal teams.


Our end-to-end services include QA audit and strategy, manual testing, test automation, accessibility testing, performance and load testing, security testing, API testing, web application testing, mobile application testing, desktop application testing, AI system testing, and technical support. We work with product teams that need to establish a QA function, improve release confidence, scale testing capacity, or strengthen an existing quality process.


Every engagement is delivered by 100% Middle and Senior QA engineers. Our specialists work as an embedded extension of client product and development teams, align with established tools and workflows, identify quality risks early, and provide clear, actionable testing insights. QA Madness applies AI-assisted workflows where they improve test design, automation, maintenance, and analysis, while keeping experienced engineering oversight throughout delivery.


QA Madness supports AI SaaS, B2B SaaS, HealthTech, MedTech, FinTech, GovTech, RegTech, EdTech, e-commerce, aviation, logistics, mobility, and supply-chain software companies. We work with startups, scale-ups, and established organizations across the United Kingdom, United States, European Union, Canada, and Australia.


Delivery is centered in CET, with overlapping working hours for UK, European, and North American CT and ET teams. QA Madness is an ISTQB Silver Partner and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certified. Engagement rates start from $25 per hour, depending on the expertise, service scope, project complexity, and engagement model.

Reliable QA teams for long-term software quality

Techreviewer Score

  Submit a review
4.8

Client review platforms

The company's reputation is reflected through ratings and reviews from different review websites:

4.8
(38 reviews)Clutch
4.8
(7 reviews)GoodFirms

AI Overview

Powered bytechreviewer AI
This company performance overview is based on AI analysis of 45 client reviews across 2 different review platforms. Read more about our methodology.
Last updated: October 2026

Performance snapshot

QA Madness is a specialized QA and software testing firm with a consistently strong performance profile across a broad client base spanning gaming, e-commerce, SaaS, and marketing. The majority of ratings across both platforms are at or near perfect scores, with only isolated concerns around team composition changes and a desire for expanded test automation. Recurring strengths include meticulous bug reporting, proactive communication, and long-term client retention, with several engagements spanning multiple years.

Performance breakdown

Technical expertise
Strong

Reviewers consistently highlight deep testing capabilities across manual, regression, compatibility, performance, and automation testing on web, mobile, and console platforms. One anchor review cites hundreds of test cases executed and a 20% iOS conversion rate improvement, meeting the High Density threshold.

Project management & delivery
Mixed

The majority of reviews praise on-time delivery and structured workflows, with schedule sub-ratings at 5.0 across most engagements. However, one review cited inability to maintain senior resource allocation mid-project, and another noted a delay in one of two concurrent projects.

Communication & collaboration
Strong

Communication is one of the most frequently praised attributes, described as transparent, proactive, and seamless across multiple time zones and communication tools including Slack and email. Multiple reviewers note the team integrates smoothly with internal staff, functioning as an embedded extension of the client team.

Reliability
Strong

Long-term engagements—some spanning over a decade—demonstrate strong consistency. Reviewers frequently cite bug-free deployments, reduced crash rates, and near-zero defect rates in final products. One isolated negative review about junior resource substitution is the only notable reliability concern across 45 reviews.

Client satisfaction & outcomes
Strong

Quantified outcomes include a 20% increase in conversion rates, a 50% improvement in QA turnaround time, feature release cycles reduced from one month to one week, and 50 previously unknown bugs discovered at engagement start. Willingness-to-refer sub-ratings are consistently at 5.0 across reviewed engagements.

Best for

QA Madness is best suited for small-to-mid-sized software, e-commerce, and gaming companies seeking dedicated manual and regression testing support, particularly those requiring rapid turnaround, cross-device compatibility testing, and seamless integration with internal development teams.

Clients info

QA Madness serves primarily small-to-mid-sized companies in e-commerce, gaming, SaaS, advertising, and IT services. Most clients fall in the 11–50 and 51–200 employee bands. Project budgets typically range from under $10,000 to $49,999, with a small number of larger engagements exceeding $50,000. Primary industries represented include eCommerce, Gaming, Advertising & Marketing, Information Technology, SaaS / Software Development. Typical client size bands include 1–10 Employees, 11–50 Employees, 51–200 Employees. Common project budget ranges include Less than $10,000, $10,000 to $49,999, $50,000 to $199,999.

Review strength

The assessment is based on 45 reviews across 2 platforms, with the most recent review dated June 2026 and the oldest from August 2016. The review base is broad and recent, though approximately one-third of reviews are more than five years old and reflect earlier operational periods. Review date range: Aug 2016 - Jun 2026.

Performance breakdown

Technical expertise
Strong

Reviewers consistently highlight deep testing capabilities across manual, regression, compatibility, performance, and automation testing on web, mobile, and console platforms. One anchor review cites hundreds of test cases executed and a 20% iOS conversion rate improvement, meeting the High Density threshold.

Project management & delivery
Mixed

The majority of reviews praise on-time delivery and structured workflows, with schedule sub-ratings at 5.0 across most engagements. However, one review cited inability to maintain senior resource allocation mid-project, and another noted a delay in one of two concurrent projects.

Communication & collaboration
Strong

Communication is one of the most frequently praised attributes, described as transparent, proactive, and seamless across multiple time zones and communication tools including Slack and email. Multiple reviewers note the team integrates smoothly with internal staff, functioning as an embedded extension of the client team.

Reliability
Strong

Long-term engagements—some spanning over a decade—demonstrate strong consistency. Reviewers frequently cite bug-free deployments, reduced crash rates, and near-zero defect rates in final products. One isolated negative review about junior resource substitution is the only notable reliability concern across 45 reviews.

Client satisfaction & outcomes
Strong

Quantified outcomes include a 20% increase in conversion rates, a 50% improvement in QA turnaround time, feature release cycles reduced from one month to one week, and 50 previously unknown bugs discovered at engagement start. Willingness-to-refer sub-ratings are consistently at 5.0 across reviewed engagements.

Location and contacts

Poland, Warsaw
151 Aleje Jerozolimskie

Major clients

Supply Chain (Orderly)
Logistics & Delivery (Undisclosed)
Healthcare (iiaa, Lunaphore)
eCommerce (Amasty, Viamo)
Marketing & Branding (Brkfst)
E-Learning (Undisclosed)
Software Development (DevPocket)
Sports & Fitness (FightCamp)

Processes and approach