* Python development * Django development * Auctions development * React, VueJs * Automated testing (Playwright, Cypress, robot framework) * Cloud/AWS/DevOps (Ansible, Docker, Terraform, Kubernetes, etc) * Open Procurement solutions * Prozorro * Public Procurement * Python e-commerce * SaaS development * API development and automated testing * Plone development * Pyramid development * Plone hosting * Responsive Plone Themes * Plone Migration and Upgrades * Plone consulting * Plone Support * Search Engine Optimization * Responsive Web design * Mobile web applications
* Python development * Django development * Auctions development * React, VueJs * Automated testing (Playwright, Cypress, robot framework) * Cloud/AWS/DevOps (Ansible, Docker, Terraform, Kubernetes, etc) * Open Procurement solutions * Prozorro * Public Procurement * Python e-commerce * SaaS development * API development and automated testing * Plone development * Pyramid development * Plone hosting * Responsive Plone Themes * Plone Migration and Upgrades * Plone consulting * Plone Support * Search Engine Optimization * Responsive Web design * Mobile web applications
AI Overview
Performance snapshot
Quintagroup is a Ukraine-based software and web development firm with demonstrated strengths in Python/Django backend development, Plone CMS, and custom procurement or auction platforms. Across 15 reviews spanning multiple platforms, the majority of ratings are strongly positive, though one significant negative review—citing contract non-delivery and budget overruns on a real estate auction project—introduces a notable reliability concern. Most categories score Strong due to consistent positive evidence across long-term client relationships, but the presence of that single severe complaint tempers the overall picture. The vendor appears best positioned for technically complex, longer-horizon engagements rather than high-stakes fixed-scope contracts.
Performance breakdown
Technical expertise
StrongMultiple reviews reference specific technical deliverables including Django/Python backend development, Plone CMS customization, e-auction systems, and IoT-integrated platforms. A state-owned enterprise noted the final e-auction system became the core of their business, and an NGO's procurement systems now support millions of tenders for hundreds of thousands of users.
Project management & delivery
MixedThe majority of reviews cite on-time delivery and effective project management, with schedule sub-ratings frequently at 4.5–5.0. However, one review reported significant failure to deliver contracted work within budget, with schedule sub-rating of only 2.0, preventing a Strong rating for this category.
Communication & collaboration
StrongCommunication is the most consistently praised attribute across reviews, with multiple clients highlighting transparency, responsiveness, and proactive updates. Even the most critical reviewer acknowledged communication as the team's relative strength, and the GoodFirms review confirmed thorough clarification processes to avoid errors.
Reliability
MixedMost long-term clients report stable, bug-free deliverables—including a decade-long website partnership with good uptime and a government e-auction system running as a core business solution. The 2021 one-star review citing non-delivery and uncharged budget overruns is a material reliability concern that cannot be discounted.
Client satisfaction & outcomes
StrongTangible outcomes are documented across multiple engagements: a dashboard that streamlined business processes, a robust MVP entering beta with strong internal feedback, and a procurement system serving hundreds of thousands of users supporting millions of tenders. The overwhelming majority of clients expressed willingness to refer, with sub-ratings averaging 4.8.
Best for
Quintagroup is best suited for organizations needing Python/Django or Plone CMS development, backend-heavy platforms, or civic-tech procurement systems. They are a strong fit for startups and mid-size firms seeking a long-term, cost-effective development partner.
Clients info
Quintagroup's client base spans information technology, financial services, government, and NGO sectors, with notable civic-tech and fintech engagements. Clients are predominantly small to mid-size organizations, ranging from early-stage startups to 51–200 employee firms. Project budgets most commonly fall in the $10,000–$199,999 range, with several larger engagements reaching $200,000–$999,999. Primary industries represented include Information Technology, Financial Services, Government & Public Sector, Non-Profit & NGO, Education, Telecommunications. Typical client size bands include 1–10 Employees, 11–50 Employees, 51–200 Employees. Common project budget ranges include $10,000 to $49,999, $50,000 to $199,999, $200,000 to $999,999.
Review strength
The assessment is based on 15 reviews drawn from 2 platforms. The most recent review dates from March 2023, while the majority of reviews were published between 2018 and 2021, making much of the data more than three years old. Findings should be interpreted with caution given the age of most reviews. Review date range: Jul 24, 2018 - Mar 13, 2023.
Performance breakdown
Technical expertise
StrongMultiple reviews reference specific technical deliverables including Django/Python backend development, Plone CMS customization, e-auction systems, and IoT-integrated platforms. A state-owned enterprise noted the final e-auction system became the core of their business, and an NGO's procurement systems now support millions of tenders for hundreds of thousands of users.
Project management & delivery
MixedThe majority of reviews cite on-time delivery and effective project management, with schedule sub-ratings frequently at 4.5–5.0. However, one review reported significant failure to deliver contracted work within budget, with schedule sub-rating of only 2.0, preventing a Strong rating for this category.
Communication & collaboration
StrongCommunication is the most consistently praised attribute across reviews, with multiple clients highlighting transparency, responsiveness, and proactive updates. Even the most critical reviewer acknowledged communication as the team's relative strength, and the GoodFirms review confirmed thorough clarification processes to avoid errors.
Reliability
MixedMost long-term clients report stable, bug-free deliverables—including a decade-long website partnership with good uptime and a government e-auction system running as a core business solution. The 2021 one-star review citing non-delivery and uncharged budget overruns is a material reliability concern that cannot be discounted.
Client satisfaction & outcomes
StrongTangible outcomes are documented across multiple engagements: a dashboard that streamlined business processes, a robust MVP entering beta with strong internal feedback, and a procurement system serving hundreds of thousands of users supporting millions of tenders. The overwhelming majority of clients expressed willingness to refer, with sub-ratings averaging 4.8.