TechnoScore is a highly-rated digital engineering and software development firm with 25+ years of experience delivering high-impact solutions, IT services, and platforms for global clients. Driven by a team of 200+ developers, designers, and QA specialists, we specialize in building AI-enabled development across web, mobile, cloud, and enterprise software ecosystems. From end-to-end development and full-scale digital modernization to QA testing, TechnoScore has delivered 6,000+ successful projects defined by quality, innovation, and fast turnaround times.
Why Choose Us:
- ISO/IEC 27001:2013 certified for Data Security
- ISO 9001:2015 certified for Data Quality
- CMMI level 3 certified
- Strict adherence to NDAs and SLAs
- Agile development approach
- Quick turnaround time
- Vetted bench of developers
- L3 post-development support
- Shopify Solutions Partner
Visit our website to know more about the services, hiring models, and pricing.
TechnoScore is a highly-rated digital engineering and software development firm with 25+ years of experience delivering high-impact solutions, IT services, and platforms for global clients. Driven by a team of 200+ developers, designers, and QA specialists, we specialize in building AI-enabled development across web, mobile, cloud, and enterprise software ecosystems. From end-to-end development and full-scale digital modernization to QA testing, TechnoScore has delivered 6,000+ successful projects defined by quality, innovation, and fast turnaround times.
Why Choose Us:
- ISO/IEC 27001:2013 certified for Data Security
- ISO 9001:2015 certified for Data Quality
- CMMI level 3 certified
- Strict adherence to NDAs and SLAs
- Agile development approach
- Quick turnaround time
- Vetted bench of developers
- L3 post-development support
- Shopify Solutions Partner
Visit our website to know more about the services, hiring models, and pricing.
AI Overview
Performance snapshot
TechnoScore is a long-standing web and app development vendor with a broad service portfolio spanning WordPress, eCommerce, mobile apps, and custom web applications. The majority of reviews are positive, reflecting consistent praise for technical breadth, communication, and timely delivery. However, two recent negative reviews from 2025 — describing significant financial loss, failed deliverables, and unresponsive behavior — introduce material reliability concerns that temper an otherwise favorable profile. The pattern suggests performance may vary significantly depending on project complexity or account management.
Performance breakdown
Technical expertise
MixedMultiple reviews cite proficiency in MEAN stack, Python, .NET, JavaScript, Magento, and WordPress, with one referencing AI-based website delivery. However, two recent 2025 reviews allege inexperienced developers who failed to deliver promised functionality, introducing credibility concerns around technical depth.
Project management & delivery
MixedSeveral reviews praise milestone-based updates, agile methodology, and on-time delivery. One review specifically notes tasks completed ahead of schedule. However, a 2020 negative review and two 2025 complaints describe unresolved deliverables and unresponsive project handling, indicating inconsistency at the delivery level.
Communication & collaboration
MixedPositive reviews frequently highlight proactive project managers, transparency, and regular progress updates. Counterbalancing this, two recent high-severity reviews cite complete communication breakdown, with ignored emails over extended periods, suggesting communication quality may be inconsistent across engagements.
Reliability
MixedLong-tenured client relationships spanning 10 to 14 years suggest a reliable track record for some accounts. However, two 2025 reviews allege non-delivery, financial losses exceeding £8,000, and refusal to take responsibility — representing a notable reliability risk that cannot be dismissed.
Client satisfaction & outcomes
MixedMost clients report satisfaction with final deliverables, citing boosted site traffic, improved site speed, and positive user responses. Two extreme negative outcomes — including significant financial loss and unresolved disputes — lower the overall satisfaction profile despite an otherwise broadly positive sentiment across the review base.
Best for
TechnoScore is best suited for SMBs and startups seeking cost-effective web development, eCommerce builds, and custom web applications. Clients with straightforward digital presence needs, WordPress or WooCommerce projects, and moderate budgets are likely to see the strongest outcomes.
Clients info
TechnoScore serves a diverse client base spanning eCommerce, food and beverage, healthcare, real estate, financial services, marketing, travel, and education. Clients are predominantly small businesses and startups, with some mid-sized firms represented. Project budgets typically fall below $50,000, with several engagements under $10,000. Primary industries represented include eCommerce, Food & Beverages, Marketing & Advertising, Financial Services, Healthcare, Real Estate, Leisure, Travel & Tourism, Education. Typical client size bands include 1–10 Employees, Under 49 Employees, 50–249 Employees. Common project budget ranges include Less than $10,000, $10,000 to $49,999.
Review strength
49 reviews were analyzed across 4 platforms, spanning from June 2015 to July 2025. The majority of reviews pre-date 2023, and several are more than one year old. The two most recent reviews, published in July 2025, are significantly negative and should be weighted accordingly given their recency and specificity. Review date range: 2015-06-15 - 2025-07-24.
Performance breakdown
Technical expertise
MixedMultiple reviews cite proficiency in MEAN stack, Python, .NET, JavaScript, Magento, and WordPress, with one referencing AI-based website delivery. However, two recent 2025 reviews allege inexperienced developers who failed to deliver promised functionality, introducing credibility concerns around technical depth.
Project management & delivery
MixedSeveral reviews praise milestone-based updates, agile methodology, and on-time delivery. One review specifically notes tasks completed ahead of schedule. However, a 2020 negative review and two 2025 complaints describe unresolved deliverables and unresponsive project handling, indicating inconsistency at the delivery level.
Communication & collaboration
MixedPositive reviews frequently highlight proactive project managers, transparency, and regular progress updates. Counterbalancing this, two recent high-severity reviews cite complete communication breakdown, with ignored emails over extended periods, suggesting communication quality may be inconsistent across engagements.
Reliability
MixedLong-tenured client relationships spanning 10 to 14 years suggest a reliable track record for some accounts. However, two 2025 reviews allege non-delivery, financial losses exceeding £8,000, and refusal to take responsibility — representing a notable reliability risk that cannot be dismissed.
Client satisfaction & outcomes
MixedMost clients report satisfaction with final deliverables, citing boosted site traffic, improved site speed, and positive user responses. Two extreme negative outcomes — including significant financial loss and unresolved disputes — lower the overall satisfaction profile despite an otherwise broadly positive sentiment across the review base.