TechnoScore is a highly-rated digital engineering and software development firm with 25+ years of experience delivering high-impact solutions, IT services, and platforms for global clients. Driven by a team of 200+ developers, designers, and QA specialists, we specialize in building AI-enabled development across web, mobile, cloud, and enterprise software ecosystems. From end-to-end development and full-scale digital modernization to QA testing, TechnoScore has delivered 6,000+ successful projects defined by quality, innovation, and fast turnaround times.
Why Choose Us:
- ISO/IEC 27001:2013 certified for Data Security
- ISO 9001:2015 certified for Data Quality
- CMMI level 3 certified
- Strict adherence to NDAs and SLAs
- Agile development approach
- Quick turnaround time
- Vetted bench of developers
- L3 post-development support
- Shopify Solutions Partner
Visit our website to know more about the services, hiring models, and pricing.
TechnoScore is a highly-rated digital engineering and software development firm with 25+ years of experience delivering high-impact solutions, IT services, and platforms for global clients. Driven by a team of 200+ developers, designers, and QA specialists, we specialize in building AI-enabled development across web, mobile, cloud, and enterprise software ecosystems. From end-to-end development and full-scale digital modernization to QA testing, TechnoScore has delivered 6,000+ successful projects defined by quality, innovation, and fast turnaround times.
Why Choose Us:
- ISO/IEC 27001:2013 certified for Data Security
- ISO 9001:2015 certified for Data Quality
- CMMI level 3 certified
- Strict adherence to NDAs and SLAs
- Agile development approach
- Quick turnaround time
- Vetted bench of developers
- L3 post-development support
- Shopify Solutions Partner
Visit our website to know more about the services, hiring models, and pricing.
AI Overview
Performance snapshot
TechnoScore is a broadly experienced web and app development vendor with a long operational history, serving small businesses and startups across diverse industries. The review corpus reflects a predominantly positive sentiment across most categories, with consistent praise for technical breadth, communication, and delivery. However, two recent 1-star reviews from 2025 describe a significant financial loss, unresponsiveness, and failure to deliver, introducing a meaningful reliability concern that moderates the overall assessment.
Performance breakdown
Technical expertise
StrongMultiple reviews reference specific technologies including MEAN stack, Python, .NET, HTML5, Magento, WooCommerce, Progressive Web Apps, and AI-based builds. Reviewers consistently praised developer proficiency, and a Clutch anchor review confirmed quality sub-ratings of 5.0 alongside agile execution.
Project management & delivery
MixedSeveral reviews highlight milestone-based updates, on-time delivery, and well-planned SDLCs. However, two recent 2025 reviews allege complete failure to deliver on a paid project, and a 2020 review cited poor task execution and unresolved billing disputes, indicating delivery inconsistency.
Communication & collaboration
MixedPositive reviews frequently commend responsiveness, proactive updates, and transparency, with specific project managers named for strong client engagement. Conversely, the 2025 and 2020 negative reviews cite ignored emails and total communication breakdown, representing a significant counterpoint.
Reliability
MixedLong-term client relationships spanning 10 to 14 years suggest sustained reliability for some clients. However, repeated allegations of non-delivery, refusal to accept responsibility, and ignored follow-ups in the most recent reviews introduce a pattern of concern that cannot be discounted.
Client satisfaction & outcomes
MixedThe majority of reviews report strong satisfaction, citing improved site traffic, speed gains, successful product launches, and cost-effective delivery. The 2025 reviews describing over £8,000 in total financial losses materially offset an otherwise positive outcomes record and cannot be treated as isolated data points.
Best for
TechnoScore is best suited for small businesses and startups seeking affordable, full-service web and app development, particularly WordPress, WooCommerce, and custom web applications requiring agile delivery and multi-technology expertise.
Clients info
TechnoScore serves a wide range of industries including e-commerce, food and beverage, financial services, healthcare, travel, real estate, and marketing. Clients are predominantly small businesses and startups, with several micro-businesses and companies under 250 employees represented. Project budgets reported on verified review platforms range from under $10,000 to $49,999, indicating a focus on the SMB budget segment. Primary industries represented include E-Commerce, Food & Beverages, Marketing and Advertising, Financial Services, Leisure, Travel & Tourism, Real Estate, Hospital & Healthcare. Typical client size bands include 1-10 Employees, Under 49 Employees, 50-249 Employees. Common project budget ranges include Less than $10,000, $10,000 to $49,999.
Review strength
The assessment is based on 49 reviews across 4 platforms, spanning from June 2015 to July 2025. The dataset is broad in volume, but a significant portion of reviews are more than one year old, with many dating from 2018 to 2021. The two most recent reviews from July 2025 are strongly negative and carry particular weight in the assessment. Review date range: 2015-06-15 - 2025-07-24.
Performance breakdown
Technical expertise
StrongMultiple reviews reference specific technologies including MEAN stack, Python, .NET, HTML5, Magento, WooCommerce, Progressive Web Apps, and AI-based builds. Reviewers consistently praised developer proficiency, and a Clutch anchor review confirmed quality sub-ratings of 5.0 alongside agile execution.
Project management & delivery
MixedSeveral reviews highlight milestone-based updates, on-time delivery, and well-planned SDLCs. However, two recent 2025 reviews allege complete failure to deliver on a paid project, and a 2020 review cited poor task execution and unresolved billing disputes, indicating delivery inconsistency.
Communication & collaboration
MixedPositive reviews frequently commend responsiveness, proactive updates, and transparency, with specific project managers named for strong client engagement. Conversely, the 2025 and 2020 negative reviews cite ignored emails and total communication breakdown, representing a significant counterpoint.
Reliability
MixedLong-term client relationships spanning 10 to 14 years suggest sustained reliability for some clients. However, repeated allegations of non-delivery, refusal to accept responsibility, and ignored follow-ups in the most recent reviews introduce a pattern of concern that cannot be discounted.
Client satisfaction & outcomes
MixedThe majority of reviews report strong satisfaction, citing improved site traffic, speed gains, successful product launches, and cost-effective delivery. The 2025 reviews describing over £8,000 in total financial losses materially offset an otherwise positive outcomes record and cannot be treated as isolated data points.