TechnoScore is a highly-rated digital engineering and software development firm with 25+ years of experience delivering high-impact solutions, IT services, and platforms for global clients. Driven by a team of 200+ developers, designers, and QA specialists, we specialize in building AI-enabled development across web, mobile, cloud, and enterprise software ecosystems. From end-to-end development and full-scale digital modernization to QA testing, TechnoScore has delivered 6,000+ successful projects defined by quality, innovation, and fast turnaround times.
Why Choose Us:
- ISO/IEC 27001:2013 certified for Data Security
- ISO 9001:2015 certified for Data Quality
- CMMI level 3 certified
- Strict adherence to NDAs and SLAs
- Agile development approach
- Quick turnaround time
- Vetted bench of developers
- L3 post-development support
- Shopify Solutions Partner
Visit our website to know more about the services, hiring models, and pricing.
TechnoScore is a highly-rated digital engineering and software development firm with 25+ years of experience delivering high-impact solutions, IT services, and platforms for global clients. Driven by a team of 200+ developers, designers, and QA specialists, we specialize in building AI-enabled development across web, mobile, cloud, and enterprise software ecosystems. From end-to-end development and full-scale digital modernization to QA testing, TechnoScore has delivered 6,000+ successful projects defined by quality, innovation, and fast turnaround times.
Why Choose Us:
- ISO/IEC 27001:2013 certified for Data Security
- ISO 9001:2015 certified for Data Quality
- CMMI level 3 certified
- Strict adherence to NDAs and SLAs
- Agile development approach
- Quick turnaround time
- Vetted bench of developers
- L3 post-development support
- Shopify Solutions Partner
Visit our website to know more about the services, hiring models, and pricing.
AI Overview
Performance snapshot
TechnoScore is a generalist web and app development vendor with a long operational track record spanning over a decade, serving small-to-midsize clients across diverse industries. The review corpus yields mostly positive signals on technical delivery, communication, and project management, but is significantly undermined by two recent high-impact negative reviews describing financial loss, non-delivery, and unresponsiveness. The pattern of ratings skews Strong across most categories when older reviews dominate the analysis, but the 2025 negative accounts introduce meaningful reliability and accountability concerns that cannot be dismissed.
Performance breakdown
Technical expertise
MixedMultiple reviews cite proficiency across MEAN stack, .NET, Python, JavaScript, WordPress, Magento, and Progressive Web Apps. However, one high-impact negative review explicitly describes the team as 'clearly inexperienced,' directly contradicting the broader positive consensus on technical capability.
Project management & delivery
MixedSeveral reviewers praise milestone-based updates, on-time delivery, and well-planned SDLC execution. Contrasting this, two 2025 reviews and one 2020 review describe failure to deliver promised scope and an inability to provide transparent task breakdowns or quotes.
Communication & collaboration
MixedPositive reviewers consistently highlight proactive communication, regular updates, and responsive project managers. However, the 2025 and 2020 negative accounts describe ignored emails, complete unresponsiveness, and a refusal to engage on dispute resolution over extended periods.
Reliability
MixedLong-tenured client relationships of 10 to 14 years and repeated engagements suggest baseline reliability for many clients. Offset by credible accounts of financial loss exceeding £8,000, unresolved bugs attributed to vendor work, and abandoned client communications lasting up to one year.
Client satisfaction & outcomes
MixedMost reviewers report satisfaction with final deliverables including improved site traffic, speed, and feature completeness. Negative outliers describe total project failure, unrecovered funds, and no tangible business value received, creating a materially divided satisfaction picture.
Best for
TechnoScore is best suited for small businesses and startups requiring web development, e-commerce builds, or mobile app development at competitive price points, particularly where WordPress, WooCommerce, Magento, or MEAN stack expertise is needed.
Clients info
TechnoScore serves a broad mix of industries including e-commerce, food and beverage, healthcare, financial services, travel, marketing, real estate, and entertainment. Clients are predominantly small businesses and startups, with several mid-size firms also represented. Project budgets on record range from under $10,000 to $49,999, consistent with a value-tier positioning. Primary industries represented include E-Commerce, Food & Beverages, Marketing and Advertising, Financial Services, Leisure, Travel & Tourism, Hospital & Healthcare, Real Estate, Entertainment. Typical client size bands include 1-10 Employees, Under 49 Employees, 50-249 Employees. Common project budget ranges include Less than $10,000, $10,000 to $49,999.
Review strength
The assessment is based on 49 reviews across 4 platforms, spanning from June 2015 to July 2025. The majority of reviews predate 2023, and a significant portion originate from 2018 to 2022, meaning much of the positive evidence is more than two years old. The two most recent reviews, both from July 2025, are strongly negative and represent the freshest available signal. Review date range: 2015-06-15 - 2025-07-24.
Performance breakdown
Technical expertise
MixedMultiple reviews cite proficiency across MEAN stack, .NET, Python, JavaScript, WordPress, Magento, and Progressive Web Apps. However, one high-impact negative review explicitly describes the team as 'clearly inexperienced,' directly contradicting the broader positive consensus on technical capability.
Project management & delivery
MixedSeveral reviewers praise milestone-based updates, on-time delivery, and well-planned SDLC execution. Contrasting this, two 2025 reviews and one 2020 review describe failure to deliver promised scope and an inability to provide transparent task breakdowns or quotes.
Communication & collaboration
MixedPositive reviewers consistently highlight proactive communication, regular updates, and responsive project managers. However, the 2025 and 2020 negative accounts describe ignored emails, complete unresponsiveness, and a refusal to engage on dispute resolution over extended periods.
Reliability
MixedLong-tenured client relationships of 10 to 14 years and repeated engagements suggest baseline reliability for many clients. Offset by credible accounts of financial loss exceeding £8,000, unresolved bugs attributed to vendor work, and abandoned client communications lasting up to one year.
Client satisfaction & outcomes
MixedMost reviewers report satisfaction with final deliverables including improved site traffic, speed, and feature completeness. Negative outliers describe total project failure, unrecovered funds, and no tangible business value received, creating a materially divided satisfaction picture.