<$5,000
$20 - $29 / hr
50 - 99
Startups
United States, Los Angeles
2020
Within 1 week
Let’s build a great website together!

Website Turbix is a full-service web design and development company based in Los Angeles, California. We are a team of experienced website designers, developers and creative thinkers. We have helped hundreds of brands exceed their web design requirements by delivering versatility through web design elements and features.

Let’s build a great website together!

Techreviewer Score

  Submit a review
1.9

Client review platforms

The company's reputation is reflected through ratings and reviews from different review websites:

4.0
(1 reviews)Clutch
2.3
(1 reviews)DesignRush
2.0
(13 reviews)Trustpilot
1.0
(1 reviews)Google

AI Overview

Powered bytechreviewer AI
This company performance overview is based on AI analysis of 16 client reviews across 4 different review platforms. Read more about our methodology.
Last updated: June 2026

Performance snapshot

Website Turbix presents a deeply polarized performance profile. A cluster of positive reviews from early-to-mid 2022 highlights responsive service and affordable pricing, while a mounting body of more recent reviews—spanning 2022 through 2026—documents serious allegations including fraud, refusal of refunds, disappearing after payment, and deceptive business practices. The pattern of ratings is predominantly Weak across core categories, with no high-density anchor reviews providing verifiable metrics to offset the volume of negative evidence.

Performance breakdown

Technical expertise
Weak

A handful of early 2022 reviews mention clean, user-friendly website delivery and animation video production. However, multiple reviewers reported broken layouts, unsecured graphics, and incomplete deliverables, undermining confidence in consistent technical quality.

Project management & delivery
Weak

One Clutch review rated schedule at 4.0, but multiple independent reviewers describe projects stalling for months, with one reporting only 30% completion after three months and response times stretching to one week between contacts.

Communication & collaboration
Weak

Early reviews cite prompt and courteous communication, but a significant and more recent pattern describes complete unresponsiveness post-payment, non-functional phone numbers, unanswered emails, and alleged false business addresses provided to clients.

Reliability
Weak

Severe reliability concerns are documented across multiple reviews, including a client's live website being replaced with an ADA non-compliance notice, withheld website files, and hosting services allegedly denied after payment was received.

Client satisfaction & outcomes
Weak

While a subset of 2022 clients expressed satisfaction with their final websites, the majority of reviewers—particularly those from 2023 onward—report zero business value delivered, financial losses, and active regulatory complaints filed with the FTC and BBB.

Best for

Based on available data, Website Turbix cannot be confidently recommended for any specific use case. The volume and severity of negative reports—including allegations of fraud and service abandonment—present material procurement risk.

Clients info

Clients appear to be predominantly small businesses and sole proprietors across industries including construction, home care, media, rental services, and e-commerce. Project budgets are consistently reported below $10,000, with several engagements in the $300–$1,400 range based on reviewer-disclosed spend. Primary industries represented include Construction, Home Care & Health Services, Media & Entertainment, Rental & Transportation, E-commerce. Typical client size bands include Under 49 employees, Sole proprietors / Owner-operated businesses. Common project budget ranges include Less than $10,000, $300 – $1,400 (reviewer-disclosed).

Review strength

The assessment is based on 16 reviews across 4 platforms, spanning February 2022 to April 2026. The majority of positive reviews are concentrated in early-to-mid 2022 and are more than two years old, while negative reviews are more recent and ongoing through 2026, indicating a deteriorating trend over time. Review date range: 2022-02-04 - 2026-04-28.

Performance breakdown

Technical expertise
Weak

A handful of early 2022 reviews mention clean, user-friendly website delivery and animation video production. However, multiple reviewers reported broken layouts, unsecured graphics, and incomplete deliverables, undermining confidence in consistent technical quality.

Project management & delivery
Weak

One Clutch review rated schedule at 4.0, but multiple independent reviewers describe projects stalling for months, with one reporting only 30% completion after three months and response times stretching to one week between contacts.

Communication & collaboration
Weak

Early reviews cite prompt and courteous communication, but a significant and more recent pattern describes complete unresponsiveness post-payment, non-functional phone numbers, unanswered emails, and alleged false business addresses provided to clients.

Reliability
Weak

Severe reliability concerns are documented across multiple reviews, including a client's live website being replaced with an ADA non-compliance notice, withheld website files, and hosting services allegedly denied after payment was received.

Client satisfaction & outcomes
Weak

While a subset of 2022 clients expressed satisfaction with their final websites, the majority of reviewers—particularly those from 2023 onward—report zero business value delivered, financial losses, and active regulatory complaints filed with the FTC and BBB.

Location and contacts

United States, Los Angeles
11755 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1251
90025
+12139332150
United States, Sugar Land
15500 Voss Road, Suite 230D
77498
+12139332150

Major clients

Chico's
Back 2 School