Launched in 2017
Free trial
Free version

Fellow.app is a meeting productivity platform designed to help teams and managers run more structured and effective meetings. It provides tools for building collaborative meeting agendas before meetings begin, capturing real-time notes during meetings, and assigning and tracking action items afterward. The platform includes an AI meeting assistant that can automatically record, transcribe, and summarize meetings, generating highlights and follow-up tasks. Fellow integrates with widely used calendar, video conferencing, and communication tools, allowing meeting notes and agendas to surface directly within existing workflows. It also offers a library of meeting templates for common meeting types such as one-on-ones, team standups, and performance reviews. Fellow is used by individual contributors, managers, and larger organizations seeking to improve meeting culture, accountability, and follow-through on decisions made during meetings.

Do you work for Fellow.app?Claim this product page

Target audience and deployment

  • Solo / Freelancer
  • Startup
  • SMB
  • Mid-market
  • Enterprise
  • Cloud
  • Browser extension

Techreviewer Score

  Submit a review
4.8

Product review platforms

The product's reputation is reflected through ratings and reviews from different review websites:

4.7
(17 reviews)Product Hunt
4.9
(37 reviews)GetApp

AI Overview

Powered bytechreviewer AI
This product performance overview is based on AI analysis of 92 client reviews across 3 different review platforms. Read more about our methodology.
Last updated: September 2026

Performance snapshot

Fellow.app earns a consistently strong reception across usability, functionality, and cost-effectiveness, driven by its AI-powered transcription, meeting summaries, action-item tracking, and calendar integrations. Reliability draws mixed signals, with most users praising stability but a recurring minority reporting slow load times and occasional lost recordings. Support is the clearest standout strength, frequently cited as fast and genuinely helpful. The overall profile is that of a polished, well-supported meeting management platform with minor performance and UI rough edges.

Pros

  • AI-generated meeting summaries, transcripts, and action items are consistently praised for accuracy and time savings.
  • Deep integrations with Google Calendar, Google Meet, Slack, Jira, and Zoom streamline existing workflows without friction.
  • The 'Ask Fellow' knowledge-base feature lets users query past meetings, making institutional knowledge easily retrievable.
  • Meeting templates and structured agendas improve preparation and accountability across recurring and one-off meetings.
  • Support team is widely described as fast, knowledgeable, and responsive, often resolving issues within minutes.

Cons

  • Slow UI load times and occasional lag are a recurring complaint, particularly as meeting history grows.
  • Occasional lost or failed recordings have been reported, representing a reliability gap for time-sensitive content.
  • Initial onboarding can feel overwhelming; several reviewers needed weeks before discovering the product's full value.
  • Zoom integration is reported as less reliable than Google Meet support, limiting utility for Zoom-first teams.
  • No offline mode limits usability for mobile users without consistent internet access.

Performance breakdown

Usability
Strong

The large majority of reviewers describe Fellow as easy to use, intuitive, and quick to navigate once onboarded. A consistent minority note that the UI feels overwhelming initially and that navigation or speed could be improved, but satisfaction clearly dominates.

Functionality
Strong

AI transcription, meeting summaries, action-item automation, agenda templates, calendar integration, and the 'Ask Fellow' query feature are praised extensively across reviews. Requests for dual-speaker view, better Zoom support, and offline mode are enhancement requests rather than functional failures.

Reliability & performance
Mixed

Most reviewers report consistent, stable operation over extended daily use. However, a meaningful subset specifically cite slow page load times, UI lag, and occasional lost or failed recordings — the last representing a notable content-loss risk flagged separately.

Support
Strong

Multiple reviewers across platforms call out support as exceptionally responsive, with some citing sub-five-minute response times. Setup issues, calendar configuration problems, and use-case questions are resolved quickly, and the team is described as open to feedback.

Cost-effectiveness
Strong

Reviewers who address value consistently describe Fellow as worth the investment, citing productivity gains and time saved in meetings. Explicit pricing comparisons are rare in the review set, limiting depth of evidence on this dimension.

Best for

Fellow.app is best suited for managers, team leads, and operations professionals in small to mid-market organizations who run frequent meetings and need structured agendas, accurate AI transcription, automated action items, and searchable meeting history. It delivers the most value when adopted company-wide.

Users info

Reviewers span small businesses through enterprise organizations, with the heaviest representation in small-business and mid-market segments. Roles skew toward managers, founders, operations leads, and customer success professionals. Industry coverage is broad, including computer software, IT services, health care, financial services, and consulting. Top user industries include Computer Software, Information Technology and Services, Hospital & Health Care, Financial Services, Consulting. Typical user roles include Manager / Engineering Manager, Founder / CEO / COO, Customer Success Manager / Lead, Operations / RevOps / Strategy, Head of Marketing / Sales / Business Development. Typical company size bands include Small-Business (50 or fewer employees), Mid-Market (51–1000 employees), Enterprise (1000+ employees).

Review strength

93 raw reviews were analyzed across three review platforms; after de-duplication one Product Hunt review was identified as near-identical to a cross-posted entry and merged, yielding 92 unique reviews. The dataset is heavily weighted toward recent content, with the majority published between March 2026 and September 2026. A meaningful share — approximately 12 reviews — is more than one year old (pre-2025), which slightly dilutes recency for some categories. Review date range: 2019-09-18 - 2026-09-03.

Performance breakdown

Usability
Strong

The large majority of reviewers describe Fellow as easy to use, intuitive, and quick to navigate once onboarded. A consistent minority note that the UI feels overwhelming initially and that navigation or speed could be improved, but satisfaction clearly dominates.

Functionality
Strong

AI transcription, meeting summaries, action-item automation, agenda templates, calendar integration, and the 'Ask Fellow' query feature are praised extensively across reviews. Requests for dual-speaker view, better Zoom support, and offline mode are enhancement requests rather than functional failures.

Reliability & performance
Mixed

Most reviewers report consistent, stable operation over extended daily use. However, a meaningful subset specifically cite slow page load times, UI lag, and occasional lost or failed recordings — the last representing a notable content-loss risk flagged separately.

Support
Strong

Multiple reviewers across platforms call out support as exceptionally responsive, with some citing sub-five-minute response times. Setup issues, calendar configuration problems, and use-case questions are resolved quickly, and the team is described as open to feedback.

Cost-effectiveness
Strong

Reviewers who address value consistently describe Fellow as worth the investment, citing productivity gains and time saved in meetings. Explicit pricing comparisons are rare in the review set, limiting depth of evidence on this dimension.

Review strength

93 raw reviews were analyzed across three review platforms; after de-duplication one Product Hunt review was identified as near-identical to a cross-posted entry and merged, yielding 92 unique reviews. The dataset is heavily weighted toward recent content, with the majority published between March 2026 and September 2026. A meaningful share — approximately 12 reviews — is more than one year old (pre-2025), which slightly dilutes recency for some categories. Review date range: 2019-09-18 - 2026-09-03.

Pricing

Pricing details:
Free trial
Free version
View more pricing information

Key features

AI meeting summaries and transcriptionCollaborative meeting agendasAction item trackingMeeting notesMeeting templates libraryOne-on-one meeting toolsMeeting recordingCalendar integrationReal-time collaborationMeeting insights and analytics

Use cases

  • Build collaborative meeting agendas
  • Capture and share meeting notes
  • Generate AI meeting summaries
  • Track and manage action items
  • Run structured one-on-one meetings
  • Standardize meeting workflows with templates

Best for

  • Managers who need to run structured one-on-one and team meetings with clear follow-through
  • Teams who need to capture and share meeting notes and action items efficiently
  • Operations leaders who need to standardize meeting culture across an organization
  • Remote or hybrid teams who need AI-generated summaries to stay aligned across time zones

Integrations

Communication

Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Zoom

Project management

Asana, Jira, Linear

Other

Google Calendar, Microsoft Outlook, HubSpot, Salesforce

Categories