Fellow.app is a meeting productivity platform designed to help teams and managers run more structured and effective meetings. It provides tools for building collaborative meeting agendas before meetings begin, capturing real-time notes during meetings, and assigning and tracking action items afterward. The platform includes an AI meeting assistant that can automatically record, transcribe, and summarize meetings, generating highlights and follow-up tasks. Fellow integrates with widely used calendar, video conferencing, and communication tools, allowing meeting notes and agendas to surface directly within existing workflows. It also offers a library of meeting templates for common meeting types such as one-on-ones, team standups, and performance reviews. Fellow is used by individual contributors, managers, and larger organizations seeking to improve meeting culture, accountability, and follow-through on decisions made during meetings.
Target audience and deployment
- Solo / Freelancer
- Startup
- SMB
- Mid-market
- Enterprise
- Cloud
- Browser extension
AI Overview
Performance snapshot
Fellow.app receives strongly positive reviews across a large, recent evidence base, with its AI-powered transcription, meeting summaries, agenda management, and calendar integrations consistently praised. Usability and functionality both rate Strong, while reliability draws mixed signals due to recurring UI lag and occasional lost recordings. Support stands out as a clear strength, and cost-effectiveness lacks enough explicit commentary for confident scoring.
Pros
- AI-generated meeting summaries, transcripts, and action items are consistently described as accurate, saving significant manual effort.
- Deep integrations with Google Calendar, Google Meet, Slack, and Jira make it easy to embed into existing workflows.
- Agenda templates and pre-meeting briefing tools help teams stay structured and prepared before calls start.
- The 'Ask Fellow' conversational search feature lets users query past meetings, acting as a persistent knowledge base.
- Particularly effective for recurring 1-on-1s, team check-ins, and sales or recruiting calls requiring reliable documentation.
Cons
- UI lag and slow load times are a recurring complaint, especially when navigating between meetings or waiting for transcripts to process.
- Occasional lost or failed recordings have been reported, representing a reliability risk for high-stakes sessions.
- The interface has a learning curve for new users; onboarding is considered insufficient by some reviewers.
- Zoom integration is less reliable than Google Meet; users on Zoom-heavy stacks may encounter friction.
- Offline mode is absent, limiting usefulness for users without consistent internet access.
Performance breakdown
Usability
StrongThe large majority of reviewers describe Fellow as easy to set up, navigate, and use daily. A recurring minority notes initial UI overwhelm and a new layout that made editing harder, but these are outweighed by positive usability sentiment.
Functionality
StrongAI transcription, meeting summaries, agenda templates, action-item tracking, and integrations with Google Workspace, Slack, and Jira are broadly praised. Gaps noted include limited Zoom reliability, absent offline mode, and requests for a dual-speaker transcript view.
Reliability & performance
MixedMany reviewers report consistent, stable performance over extended use. However, a meaningful minority flags UI lag, slow page loads, and occasional lost or failed recordings. Lost recordings represent a serious failure for time-sensitive meeting content.
Support
StrongSeveral reviewers explicitly praise responsiveness, with one citing sub-five-minute reply times and another resolving calendar domain issues quickly. No negative support experiences appear in the data, though fewer than five reviews address support directly.
Cost-effectiveness
Not enough dataReviewers rarely address pricing or value relative to cost. Satisfaction is broadly high, but insufficient explicit cost-effectiveness commentary exists to score this category reliably.
Best for
Fellow.app is best suited to managers, team leads, and customer-facing professionals in small to mid-market organizations who run frequent, structured meetings and need automated note-taking, action-item tracking, and searchable transcripts integrated with Google Workspace or Slack.
Users info
Reviewers span a wide range of roles, with managers, founders, and customer-facing professionals most represented. Industries include information technology, computer software, consulting, financial services, health care, and education. Company sizes skew toward small businesses and mid-market organizations, with a notable presence of enterprise users. Top user industries include Information Technology and Services, Computer Software, Consulting, Financial Services, Hospital & Health Care. Typical user roles include Manager / Team Lead, Founder / CEO / COO, Customer Success Manager, Product Manager, Business Development / Sales. Typical company size bands include Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.), Mid-Market (51–1000 emp.), Enterprise (>1000 emp.).
Review strength
Analysis is based on 118 unique reviews drawn from three review platforms after de-duplication. The vast majority of reviews are dated within the past 12 months, with a small number of older reviews (from 2019 to 2024) also included. Older reviews (pre-2025) represent a modest but meaningful share of the dataset and are flagged accordingly; they generally remain consistent in sentiment with recent reviews. Review date range: 2019-09-18 - 2026-08-13.
Performance breakdown
Usability
StrongThe large majority of reviewers describe Fellow as easy to set up, navigate, and use daily. A recurring minority notes initial UI overwhelm and a new layout that made editing harder, but these are outweighed by positive usability sentiment.
Functionality
StrongAI transcription, meeting summaries, agenda templates, action-item tracking, and integrations with Google Workspace, Slack, and Jira are broadly praised. Gaps noted include limited Zoom reliability, absent offline mode, and requests for a dual-speaker transcript view.
Reliability & performance
MixedMany reviewers report consistent, stable performance over extended use. However, a meaningful minority flags UI lag, slow page loads, and occasional lost or failed recordings. Lost recordings represent a serious failure for time-sensitive meeting content.
Support
StrongSeveral reviewers explicitly praise responsiveness, with one citing sub-five-minute reply times and another resolving calendar domain issues quickly. No negative support experiences appear in the data, though fewer than five reviews address support directly.
Cost-effectiveness
Not enough dataReviewers rarely address pricing or value relative to cost. Satisfaction is broadly high, but insufficient explicit cost-effectiveness commentary exists to score this category reliably.
Review strength
Analysis is based on 118 unique reviews drawn from three review platforms after de-duplication. The vast majority of reviews are dated within the past 12 months, with a small number of older reviews (from 2019 to 2024) also included. Older reviews (pre-2025) represent a modest but meaningful share of the dataset and are flagged accordingly; they generally remain consistent in sentiment with recent reviews. Review date range: 2019-09-18 - 2026-08-13.
Key features
Use cases
- Build collaborative meeting agendas
- Capture and share meeting notes
- Generate AI meeting summaries
- Track and manage action items
- Run structured one-on-one meetings
- Standardize meeting workflows with templates
Best for
- Managers who need to run structured one-on-one and team meetings with clear follow-through
- Teams who need to capture and share meeting notes and action items efficiently
- Operations leaders who need to standardize meeting culture across an organization
- Remote or hybrid teams who need AI-generated summaries to stay aligned across time zones
Integrations
Communication
Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Zoom
Project management
Asana, Jira, Linear
Other
Google Calendar, Microsoft Outlook, HubSpot, Salesforce