Fellow.app is a meeting productivity platform designed to help teams and managers run more structured and effective meetings. It provides tools for building collaborative meeting agendas before meetings begin, capturing real-time notes during meetings, and assigning and tracking action items afterward. The platform includes an AI meeting assistant that can automatically record, transcribe, and summarize meetings, generating highlights and follow-up tasks. Fellow integrates with widely used calendar, video conferencing, and communication tools, allowing meeting notes and agendas to surface directly within existing workflows. It also offers a library of meeting templates for common meeting types such as one-on-ones, team standups, and performance reviews. Fellow is used by individual contributors, managers, and larger organizations seeking to improve meeting culture, accountability, and follow-through on decisions made during meetings.
Target audience and deployment
- Solo / Freelancer
- Startup
- SMB
- Mid-market
- Enterprise
- Cloud
- Browser extension
AI Overview
Performance snapshot
Fellow.app is a strongly rated AI-powered meeting management platform, earning predominantly positive sentiment across usability, functionality, and support. Reviewers consistently highlight AI note-taking, transcription accuracy, meeting summaries, and calendar integrations as core strengths. Reliability is broadly praised, though a recurring minority of reviewers flag slow load times, occasional lost recordings, and UI navigation friction. Cost-effectiveness data is sparse but leans positive.
Pros
- AI-generated meeting summaries and accurate transcriptions save significant time and reduce manual note-taking across team sizes.
- Seamless integrations with Google Calendar, Google Meet, Slack, Jira, and Zoom accelerate adoption and fit naturally into existing workflows.
- Meeting templates, shared agendas, and action-item tracking improve accountability and keep recurring meetings structured.
- The 'Ask Fellow' conversational AI feature allows users to query past meetings as a searchable knowledge base.
- Privacy-first design and botless recording options are valued by security-conscious users and enterprise teams.
Cons
- Occasional slow load times and a laggy UI are reported by a consistent minority of reviewers, particularly in mid-market deployments.
- Isolated reports of lost or failed recordings represent a reliability risk, especially for high-stakes meetings.
- Initial setup and onboarding can feel overwhelming; some users needed several weeks before realizing full value.
- Transcription quality and multi-speaker attribution have room for improvement, particularly on Zoom and for non-English speakers.
- Offline functionality is absent, limiting utility for users without reliable internet access.
Performance breakdown
Usability
StrongThe large majority of reviewers describe Fellow as intuitive, easy to navigate, and quick to adopt, with templates and calendar auto-sync lowering the barrier to entry. A consistent minority note initial UI overwhelm or that a recent layout change made editing harder.
Functionality
StrongReviewers broadly praise AI transcription, meeting summaries, action-item automation, agenda templates, and integrations with Google Workspace, Slack, and Jira. The 'Ask Fellow' AI chat and pre-meeting briefings are cited as standout differentiating features. A small number flag transcription gaps and limited Zoom compatibility as functional shortfalls.
Reliability & performance
MixedMost reviewers report consistent, stable operation over extended periods of daily use. However, a notable minority flag slow page loads, occasional UI lag, and at least one report of lost recordings — a specific failure that warrants flagging. ⚠ Major negative noted: lost/failed recordings reported by multiple users.
Support
StrongThe reviews that directly address support are strongly positive: one reviewer reports sub-five-minute response times, another credits a quick support interaction with resolving a complex multi-domain setup issue, and a third describes support as exceptional and open to feedback. Too few reviews explicitly address support to achieve high confidence.
Cost-effectiveness
Not enough dataVery few reviews explicitly discuss pricing, value for money, or comparisons to alternatives on cost grounds. The available data is insufficient to assign a reliable tier rating.
Best for
Fellow.app is best suited for managers, team leads, and operations professionals in small to mid-market organizations who run frequent meetings and need structured agendas, automated transcription, AI summaries, and action-item tracking — particularly teams already embedded in the Google Workspace or Slack ecosystem.
Users info
Reviewers span a wide range of roles including managers, founders, customer success leads, engineers, and operations professionals. The most represented industries are Computer Software, Information Technology and Services, and Health Care, with strong representation from both small businesses and mid-market organizations. A smaller but notable segment comes from enterprise users. Top user industries include Computer Software, Information Technology and Services, Hospital & Health Care, Financial Services, Consulting. Typical user roles include Manager / Team Lead, Founder / CEO / COO, Customer Success Manager, Product Manager, Operations / Strategy. Typical company size bands include Small-Business (50 or fewer employees), Mid-Market (51–1000 employees), Enterprise (1000+ employees).
Review strength
After de-duplication, 115 unique reviews were analyzed from two review platforms. The dataset is predominantly recent, with the majority of reviews published between January 2025 and October 2026. A meaningful share — approximately 10% — is more than one year old (pre-2025), and a small number date to 2019–2022, which are treated with reduced weight. Review date range: 2019-09-18 - 2026-10-01.
Performance breakdown
Usability
StrongThe large majority of reviewers describe Fellow as intuitive, easy to navigate, and quick to adopt, with templates and calendar auto-sync lowering the barrier to entry. A consistent minority note initial UI overwhelm or that a recent layout change made editing harder.
Functionality
StrongReviewers broadly praise AI transcription, meeting summaries, action-item automation, agenda templates, and integrations with Google Workspace, Slack, and Jira. The 'Ask Fellow' AI chat and pre-meeting briefings are cited as standout differentiating features. A small number flag transcription gaps and limited Zoom compatibility as functional shortfalls.
Reliability & performance
MixedMost reviewers report consistent, stable operation over extended periods of daily use. However, a notable minority flag slow page loads, occasional UI lag, and at least one report of lost recordings — a specific failure that warrants flagging. ⚠ Major negative noted: lost/failed recordings reported by multiple users.
Support
StrongThe reviews that directly address support are strongly positive: one reviewer reports sub-five-minute response times, another credits a quick support interaction with resolving a complex multi-domain setup issue, and a third describes support as exceptional and open to feedback. Too few reviews explicitly address support to achieve high confidence.
Cost-effectiveness
Not enough dataVery few reviews explicitly discuss pricing, value for money, or comparisons to alternatives on cost grounds. The available data is insufficient to assign a reliable tier rating.
Review strength
After de-duplication, 115 unique reviews were analyzed from two review platforms. The dataset is predominantly recent, with the majority of reviews published between January 2025 and October 2026. A meaningful share — approximately 10% — is more than one year old (pre-2025), and a small number date to 2019–2022, which are treated with reduced weight. Review date range: 2019-09-18 - 2026-10-01.
Key features
Use cases
- Build collaborative meeting agendas
- Capture and share meeting notes
- Generate AI meeting summaries
- Track and manage action items
- Run structured one-on-one meetings
- Standardize meeting workflows with templates
Best for
- Managers who need to run structured one-on-one and team meetings with clear follow-through
- Teams who need to capture and share meeting notes and action items efficiently
- Operations leaders who need to standardize meeting culture across an organization
- Remote or hybrid teams who need AI-generated summaries to stay aligned across time zones
Integrations
Communication
Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Zoom
Project management
Asana, Jira, Linear
Other
Google Calendar, Microsoft Outlook, HubSpot, Salesforce