PricingStarting at USD 35
Free trial
Free version

Kreo Software is a cloud-based construction technology platform designed to streamline the pre-construction estimating process. It offers AI-powered 2D takeoff and 5D BIM estimating capabilities, enabling construction professionals to extract quantities from drawings and link them to cost data. The platform supports automated quantity takeoff from PDF drawings, reducing manual measurement work and the risk of human error. Kreo integrates BIM (Building Information Modelling) workflows with cost planning, allowing teams to move from design models to detailed estimates within a single environment. It is aimed at main contractors, subcontractors, quantity surveyors, and estimating teams who need to improve speed and accuracy during the tender and pre-construction phases. The platform is browser-based, requiring no local installation, and supports collaboration across estimating teams. Kreo positions itself as a tool for modernising traditional spreadsheet-based estimating workflows by combining automated takeoff, cost libraries, and BIM data in one place.

Do you work for Kreo Software?Claim this product page

Target audience and deployment

  • SMB
  • Mid-market
  • Enterprise
  • Cloud
  • Browser extension

Techreviewer Score

  Submit a review
4.6

Product review platforms

The product's reputation is reflected through ratings and reviews from different review websites:

4.4
(25 reviews)GetApp

AI Overview

Powered bytechreviewer AI
This product performance overview is based on AI analysis of 41 client reviews across 2 different review platforms. Read more about our methodology.
Last updated: August 2026

Performance snapshot

Kreo Software is a cloud-based construction takeoff tool that draws broadly positive reviews, with particular strength in usability and functionality. The dominant theme across reviewers is significant time savings driven by AI-assisted measurement features. Reliability and support also rate well, though a small number of reviewers flag missing editing capabilities and limitations with lower-quality or scanned drawings as recurring gaps.

Pros

  • AI-powered auto-takeoff and bucket-fill tools consistently cited as delivering 40%+ time savings over manual methods.
  • Highly accessible onboarding; multiple reviewers report being productive within minutes of first use.
  • Cloud-based architecture with low RAM consumption offers an advantage over legacy desktop takeoff software.
  • Excel output integration praised for fitting directly into existing cost-modelling and estimating workflows.
  • Support team proactively communicates about issues and responds promptly, including named staff praised by users.

Cons

  • AI features perform best on clean vector drawings; scanned or low-quality plan sets significantly limit automatic measurement accuracy.
  • Each start-stop action creates a separate line item condition, making consolidated quantity reporting cumbersome for linear takeoffs.
  • Missing editing functions noted by some users, including the ability to cut holes in areas, manually enter line sizes, and constrain shapes during editing.
  • One isolated reviewer reported the software as non-functional and not user-friendly, though this appears to be an outlier experience not corroborated elsewhere.

Performance breakdown

Usability
Strong

The overwhelming majority of reviewers describe Kreo as intuitive, easy to learn, and fast to navigate. Multiple users highlight being operational within minutes, and the modern UI is repeatedly contrasted favorably against legacy takeoff tools. One strongly negative outlier is not corroborated by the broader pool.

Functionality
Strong

AI auto-takeoff, bucket-fill measurement, auto-count, folder organization, and Excel export are praised across numerous reviews for delivering measurable productivity gains. Feature gaps around area editing, line-item consolidation, and manual size entry are raised by a minority and largely framed as enhancement requests rather than functional failures.

Reliability & performance
Mixed

Most reviewers report stable, fast performance with low resource consumption. One reviewer mentions a crash that was resolved quickly with proactive support follow-up. An older review flags bugs needing improvement. The evidence is positive but the presence of stability concerns from multiple periods prevents a Strong rating.

Support
Strong

Several reviewers explicitly praise support responsiveness, including a named team member and a case where support proactively reached out after an incident without the user raising a ticket. Pre-sales onboarding is also highlighted as effective. No negative support experiences are reported.

Cost-effectiveness
Strong

The few reviewers addressing value directly describe the product as well worth the cost, citing substantial time savings versus manual methods and prior tools. The evidence base is small but consistently positive; limited explicit price discussion prevents higher confidence.

Best for

Kreo is best suited to small construction, quantity surveying, and estimating firms that perform frequent plan takeoffs and want to reduce manual measurement time. It is especially well-matched to users working with clean vector or modern digital floor plans.

Users info

Reviewers are predominantly from small businesses with fewer than 50 employees, with a secondary cohort from mid-market firms of 51–1,000 employees. The construction industry dominates, with additional representation from commercial real estate, civil engineering, and building materials sectors. Common roles include estimators, quantity surveyors, cost consultants, and project managers. Top user industries include Construction, Commercial Real Estate, Civil Engineering, Building Materials. Typical user roles include Estimator, Quantity Surveyor, Cost Consultant, Project Manager, Director / Managing Director. Typical company size bands include Small-Business (50 or fewer employees), Mid-Market (51–1,000 employees).

Review strength

41 raw reviews were analyzed across two review platforms; after de-duplication, 41 unique reviews were retained (several G2 reviews matched Capterra entries by reviewer name and were merged). The review set spans from late 2021 to mid-2026, with the majority of reviews published between 2022 and 2024. A meaningful share of reviews is more than one year old, which should be considered when assessing current product state. Review date range: 2021-09-30 - 2026-08-18.

Performance breakdown

Usability
Strong

The overwhelming majority of reviewers describe Kreo as intuitive, easy to learn, and fast to navigate. Multiple users highlight being operational within minutes, and the modern UI is repeatedly contrasted favorably against legacy takeoff tools. One strongly negative outlier is not corroborated by the broader pool.

Functionality
Strong

AI auto-takeoff, bucket-fill measurement, auto-count, folder organization, and Excel export are praised across numerous reviews for delivering measurable productivity gains. Feature gaps around area editing, line-item consolidation, and manual size entry are raised by a minority and largely framed as enhancement requests rather than functional failures.

Reliability & performance
Mixed

Most reviewers report stable, fast performance with low resource consumption. One reviewer mentions a crash that was resolved quickly with proactive support follow-up. An older review flags bugs needing improvement. The evidence is positive but the presence of stability concerns from multiple periods prevents a Strong rating.

Support
Strong

Several reviewers explicitly praise support responsiveness, including a named team member and a case where support proactively reached out after an incident without the user raising a ticket. Pre-sales onboarding is also highlighted as effective. No negative support experiences are reported.

Cost-effectiveness
Strong

The few reviewers addressing value directly describe the product as well worth the cost, citing substantial time savings versus manual methods and prior tools. The evidence base is small but consistently positive; limited explicit price discussion prevents higher confidence.

Review strength

41 raw reviews were analyzed across two review platforms; after de-duplication, 41 unique reviews were retained (several G2 reviews matched Capterra entries by reviewer name and were merged). The review set spans from late 2021 to mid-2026, with the majority of reviews published between 2022 and 2024. A meaningful share of reviews is more than one year old, which should be considered when assessing current product state. Review date range: 2021-09-30 - 2026-08-18.

Pricing

Pricing details:
Free trial
Free version

Lite

USD35
Flat rate
Annual subscription

Plus

USD70
Flat rate
Annual subscription

Pro

USD175
Flat rate
Annual subscription
View more pricing information

Key features

AI-powered 2D takeoff5D BIM estimatingPDF drawing import and measurementAutomated quantity extractionCost library managementCloud-based collaborationTender managementBIM model integrationMeasurement annotation toolsProject cost reporting

Use cases

  • Automate 2D quantity takeoff from PDF drawings
  • Produce 5D BIM cost estimates
  • Manage and compare tender estimates
  • Collaborate on pre-construction cost planning
  • Build and maintain cost libraries

Best for

  • Estimators who need to produce faster and more accurate quantity takeoffs from PDF drawings
  • Quantity surveyors who need to link BIM models to cost planning workflows
  • Main contractors who need to streamline the tendering and pre-construction estimating process
  • Subcontractors who need an accessible cloud-based takeoff tool without complex software installation

Categories