<$5,000
<$20 / hr
10 - 49
Startups
Canada, Toronto
2015
Within 1 week
let's grow

Our expert team provides full-cycle product development and support services as well as assistance in completing your projects from any phase on time and on budget. CP’s 8+ years career comes with a blend of hard work, technology adaption, Trust & support that it has provided to its customer. ★ With the workforce of various expertise in Web Applications, Mobile Applications, eCommerce Development, Start-Up MVP Development. Our expertise spans the full range of software development, from small entrepreneurial projects to complex versatile systems. • Whether you are starting with a rough concept or already have extensive specifications and wire-frame, We will work with you to turn your idea into a reality. • With a combination of strong business and engineering experience, We can quickly turn requirements into professional results. We try to anticipate every possible use case and edge case before beginning a project. We offer maintenance and security services to ensure the system remains

let's grow

Techreviewer Score

  Submit a review
4.2

Client review platforms

The company's reputation is reflected through ratings and reviews from different review websites:

4.4
(11 reviews)Clutch
2.8
(3 reviews)Trustpilot
4.1
(29 reviews)Google

Employee review platforms

The company's work culture and employee satisfaction from top workplace review platforms:

4.1
(4 reviews)Glassdoor

AI Overview

Powered bytechreviewer AI
This company performance overview is based on AI analysis of 19 client reviews across 3 different review platforms. Read more about our methodology.
Last updated: June 2026

Performance snapshot

Codepaper is a Toronto-based web and software development agency serving small-to-mid-sized businesses across diverse industries. The majority of reviews are positive, highlighting responsiveness, on-time delivery, and strong communication, but two distinct negative cases — both citing failed deliverables and refusal to issue refunds — introduce meaningful reliability concerns. Ratings skew Strong across most categories, yet the presence of a severe 0.5-rated engagement and two 1-star complaints on a separate platform temper overall confidence, producing a Mixed signal on reliability and client satisfaction.

Performance breakdown

Technical expertise
Mixed

Multiple reviews confirm competence in Laravel, PHP, JavaScript, AWS, mobile app development, and e-commerce. However, one client rated quality at 0.5, explicitly stating the delivered website was substandard and failed to meet requirements, introducing a notable exception.

Project management & delivery
Mixed

Most clients report on-time, within-budget delivery using tools like ClickUp and Slack, with biweekly check-ins noted. One engagement (Sep. 2023–Feb. 2024) resulted in a failed delivery against timeline and scope, pulling down an otherwise consistent delivery record.

Communication & collaboration
Mixed

Communication is consistently praised across the majority of engagements — clients highlight 24/7 Slack availability, Zoom calls, and a single point of contact. One client, however, reported that calls went unanswered and issues were left unresolved, indicating inconsistency at the project level.

Reliability
Mixed

Several long-term clients describe Codepaper as reliable and trustworthy, with no coding errors and consistent responsiveness. Two separate clients (one on each of two platforms) report unresolved disputes, refused refunds, and ignored communications, representing a recurring reliability gap.

Client satisfaction & outcomes
Mixed

Strong outcomes are documented — one client gained 40 leads per month, another reduced inventory processing from days to hours. These are offset by two clients reporting the final product failed to meet expectations, with no remediation offered by the vendor.

Best for

Codepaper is best suited for small-to-medium businesses seeking website development, custom software, or digital marketing support, particularly hospitality, financial services, and event-sector clients needing budget-conscious, communicative development partners.

Clients info

Codepaper primarily serves small businesses (1–50 employees) in hospitality, financial services, education, and nonprofit sectors. Most projects fall under $50,000, with a concentration in the sub-$10,000 range, though some longer-term engagements extend to $200,000–$999,999 for ongoing custom software development. Primary industries represented include Hospitality & Leisure, Financial Services, Education, Nonprofit, Other Industries (manufacturing, cannabis, production). Typical client size bands include 1–10 Employees, 11–50 Employees, 51–200 Employees. Common project budget ranges include Less than $10,000, $10,000 to $49,999, $50,000 to $199,999, $200,000 to $999,999.

Review strength

The assessment is based on 19 reviews across 3 platforms, spanning from June 2020 to September 2024. The majority of detailed, sub-rated reviews are from 2022–2023, meaning the most recent high-detail data is over one year old. Five Google reviews lack verification and contain no project-specific metrics, limiting their analytical weight. Review date range: Jun 2020 - Sep 2024.

Performance breakdown

Technical expertise
Mixed

Multiple reviews confirm competence in Laravel, PHP, JavaScript, AWS, mobile app development, and e-commerce. However, one client rated quality at 0.5, explicitly stating the delivered website was substandard and failed to meet requirements, introducing a notable exception.

Project management & delivery
Mixed

Most clients report on-time, within-budget delivery using tools like ClickUp and Slack, with biweekly check-ins noted. One engagement (Sep. 2023–Feb. 2024) resulted in a failed delivery against timeline and scope, pulling down an otherwise consistent delivery record.

Communication & collaboration
Mixed

Communication is consistently praised across the majority of engagements — clients highlight 24/7 Slack availability, Zoom calls, and a single point of contact. One client, however, reported that calls went unanswered and issues were left unresolved, indicating inconsistency at the project level.

Reliability
Mixed

Several long-term clients describe Codepaper as reliable and trustworthy, with no coding errors and consistent responsiveness. Two separate clients (one on each of two platforms) report unresolved disputes, refused refunds, and ignored communications, representing a recurring reliability gap.

Client satisfaction & outcomes
Mixed

Strong outcomes are documented — one client gained 40 leads per month, another reduced inventory processing from days to hours. These are offset by two clients reporting the final product failed to meet expectations, with no remediation offered by the vendor.

Location and contacts

Canada, Toronto
90 Claireport cres
+64 7 548 8740

Major clients

Bi Production works
Dass Metal products
Drivisa
Metal Deals
Pita lite